Eleanor Imster at Human World in EarthSky.org reports on the use of prehistoric cave art in ancient astronomy.
See Prehistoric cave art suggests ancient use of complex astronomy
.
Sunday, December 23, 2018
Thursday, December 20, 2018
Ancient Human Cave Paintings are Astronomical according to Research at the University of Edinburgh
Hail to the Scots!
The latest news from the University of Edinburgh headlines that
Cave paintings reveal use of complex astronomy , reporting that:
We are very happy to see that other researchers are now increasingly drawing similar conclusions to those we have been publishing for decades.
Hat tips to StonePages Archaeo News
and to EurekaAlert.org at
Prehistoric cave art reveals ancient use of complex astronomy
Just keep those congratulatory cards and letters coming ....
The latest news from the University of Edinburgh headlines that
Cave paintings reveal use of complex astronomy , reporting that:
" Some of the world’s oldest cave paintings have revealed how ancient people had relatively advanced knowledge of astronomy.For the last 30 years we have been writing books and articles explaining that ancient rock art, cave paintings and megalithic sites, including carvings and markings on the megaliths themselves, represent "complex" ancient astronomy. See e.g. http://www.megaliths.net/
The artworks, at sites across Europe, are not simply depictions of wild animals, as was previously thought.
Instead, the animal symbols represent star constellations in the night sky, and are used to represent dates and mark events such as comet strikes, analysis suggests.
They reveal that, perhaps as far back as 40,000 years ago, humans kept track of time using knowledge of how the position of the stars slowly changes over thousands of years. "
We are very happy to see that other researchers are now increasingly drawing similar conclusions to those we have been publishing for decades.
Hat tips to StonePages Archaeo News
and to EurekaAlert.org at
Prehistoric cave art reveals ancient use of complex astronomy
Just keep those congratulatory cards and letters coming ....
Wednesday, December 12, 2018
China Guiding Cases Project at Stanford Law School: China's Supreme People's Court and IP Intellectual Property Law and Other Jurisprudence
At the SLS (Stanford Law School) Legal Aggregate Blog, Mei Gechlik in A Constructive Way to End the U.S.-China Trade War - Legal Aggregate - Stanford Law School
discusses China's IP [Intellectual Property] Guiding Cases and the overall Guiding Cases system, implemented in 2010 in China, writing:
" An Eight-Year System with Some Success
In November 2010, China’s Supreme People’s Court (the “SPC”) established a ground-breaking system in which certain Chinese court judgments are selected and re-issued as Guiding Cases to guide the adjudication of similar subsequent cases and ensure the uniform application of law. To date, approximately 100 Guiding Cases have been released by the SPC. Twenty of these cases address IP (e.g., patents, trademarks, copyrights, rights to new plant varieties), unfair competition, and/or antimonopoly issues and are, unlike many other cases in China, well-reasoned .
In each Guiding Case, the SPC summarizes relevant legal principles, which are, in effect, binding on all courts in China. For example, in Guiding Case No. 84, Lilly Company v. WATSON Pharmaceuticals (Changzhou) Co., Ltd., A Dispute over Infringement of an Invention Patent , the SPC summarized various legal principles, including the following (English translation prepared by Stanford Law School’s China Guiding Cases Project ) [link added by LawPundit]: ...."
Read the full story at;
A Constructive Way to End the U.S.-China Trade War - Legal Aggregate - Stanford Law School
" An Eight-Year System with Some Success
In November 2010, China’s Supreme People’s Court (the “SPC”) established a ground-breaking system in which certain Chinese court judgments are selected and re-issued as Guiding Cases to guide the adjudication of similar subsequent cases and ensure the uniform application of law. To date, approximately 100 Guiding Cases have been released by the SPC. Twenty of these cases address IP (e.g., patents, trademarks, copyrights, rights to new plant varieties), unfair competition, and/or antimonopoly issues and are, unlike many other cases in China, well-reasoned .
In each Guiding Case, the SPC summarizes relevant legal principles, which are, in effect, binding on all courts in China. For example, in Guiding Case No. 84, Lilly Company v. WATSON Pharmaceuticals (Changzhou) Co., Ltd., A Dispute over Infringement of an Invention Patent , the SPC summarized various legal principles, including the following (English translation prepared by Stanford Law School’s China Guiding Cases Project ) [link added by LawPundit]: ...."
Read the full story at;
A Constructive Way to End the U.S.-China Trade War - Legal Aggregate - Stanford Law School
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
Native American Rock Art Petroglyphs Pictographs
Deciphered as Land Survey & Astronomy by Andis Kaulins
paperbacks in color print
Volume 1, 2nd Edition, 266 pages
ISBN: 1517396816 / 9781517396817
Volume 2, 2nd Edition, 262 pages
ISBN: 1517396832 / 9781517396831
Sky Earth Native America Volume 1
Sky Earth Native America Volume 2
by Andis Kaulins J.D. Stanford by Andis Kaulins J.D. Stanford
(front cover(s))
(back cover with a photograph of the author and book absract text)
