The re-election of Peter Semone as Chairman of the executive board of the P acific Asia Travel Association (PATA) fuels a frustrated fellow board member’ s desire to contact eTurboNews with a public letter.
eTurboNews is publishing this letterand comments are welcome.
Concerns Regarding Recent PATA Chair Election Results
I wanted to address some concerning developments following the recent PATA chair election results.
It is with a heavy heart that I express my apprehensions about Mr. Peter Semone’s re-election as chair. While it is commendable to acknowledge the achievements claimed during his tenure, it is equally important to shine a light on the challenges and shortcomings faced by the organization under his leadership.
Despite assurances of regained financial stability, management prowess, and visionary direction, the reality paints a different picture. Membership decline, a staggering staff turnover rate predominantly affecting female workers, allegations of misconduct, including harassment and bullying, and rumors of questionable consultancy contracts linked to the chair have plagued our organization.
The lack of transparency reminiscent of certain political administrations only exacerbates these concerns. Vital information being withheld from the board and membership, including the sudden departure of the former CEO and the subsequent silence regarding the circumstances, are troubling signs of governance opacity.
As a longstanding board member, I am deeply disheartened by the recent election outcome and fear for the organization’s future. It is evident that PATA no longer upholds the values of transparency, integrity, and accountability that were once its cornerstone. In light of these developments, I will advocate for the termination of our membership.
I sincerely hope these issues are addressed promptly and decisively to preserve PATA’s legacy and relevance in the global travel community.
Peter Semone is an outstanding and well-respected tourism professional and he symbolises the link between PATA’s past as an American centred Association and its present as an Asian centred organisation. Ideally PATA needs to do better in harmonising its past and present representation. The Pacific (at best) has been brushed off as extra curricula to PATA. I am in no position to comment on the internal issues in PATA’s head office but as I have suggested to Peter and past CEOs that PATA could re-attract a lot of members if it had an affordable category of individual membership in addition to corporate and institution memberships. That advice has been routinely ignored..