Impossible to fix INP issue: longer than 200ms (mobile)

altankrk

unread,

Mar 13, 2024, 4:42:34 PM 3/13/24

to web-vitals-feedback

Hello,

As a professional web developer, I've exhaustively tried various approaches to resolve the issue plaguing my website's performance. Despite my efforts, it seems that this particular issue is insurmountable. There's even a possibility that resolving it might entail removing a significant portion of the content or layout from the website, which I find perplexing.

I'm puzzled as to why such a challenging task has been assigned to web.dev . Previously, everything was functioning smoothly before this update.

Additionally, I'd like to note that all interactions with Next Paint on my website occur swiftly, without any noticeable delays. Given these circumstances, I see no reason to retain it in the Core Web Vitals Assessment section. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Thanks,

Jordy S

unread,

Mar 13, 2024, 4:46:17 PM 3/13/24

to altankrk, web-vitals-feedback

Everything should be just as smooth as it was before, but with INP you'll have a better measurement for what your users experience.

What is the Core Web Vital value for your INP?

Op wo 13 mrt 2024 21:42 schreef altankrk < koruk...@gmail.com >:

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web-vitals-feedback" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web-vitals-feed...@googlegroups.com .
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/web-vitals-feedback/985f3eb0-f6a5-4366-9f28-47c5d2ce59cdn%40googlegroups.com .

altankrk

unread,

Mar 13, 2024, 4:54:54 PM 3/13/24

to web-vitals-feedback

I appreciate your prompt response. While I understand the importance of optimizing performance for better measurements, I believe that setting the threshold at 200 ms for a "need improvement" severity might be too stringent. In my opinion, it should be adjusted to 300 ms or higher to pass. Thank you for considering this adjustment.

Message has been deleted

Adam Cable

unread,

Mar 15, 2024, 1:35:00 PM 3/15/24

to web-vitals-feedback

Hey - are you able to post your URL that you're struggling to help with in regards to INP? I'd be happy to take a quick look.

Adam

Message has been deleted

SonyBVcc TV

unread,

Apr 23, 2024, 3:42:06 AM 4/23/24

to web-vitals-feedback

Hello,
I am also facing the same issue about the INP .
I have tried request for validate but still always failed.
This is an example URL that always validation failed on INP issue.
https://www.press.in.th/inches-cm/

BR,
Thanks.

ในวันที่ วันเสาร์ที่ 16 มีนาคม ค.ศ. 2024 เวลา 0 นาฬิกา 35 นาที 00 วินาที UTC+7 Adam Cable เขียนว่า:

Chris service

unread,

Apr 22, 2025, 8:06:58 AM Apr 22

to web-vitals-feedback

I also facing this issue.

you can check my web: dolarberaparupiah.id

Barry Pollard

unread,

Apr 23, 2025, 6:51:08 AM Apr 23

to Chris service, web-vitals-feedback

Please use this group to provide more specific feedback if you have any. And please start a new thread rather than replying to old threads.

We recognise INP can be difficult to consistently pass - like all the Core Web Vitals when you have issues. But we currently have no plans to reduce the threshold. Many sites are passing INP even with the 200ms threshold and we have made great improvements on that in the last year. Saying that some sites still have work to do (and yes, that includes Google sites too btw!).

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/web-vitals-feedback/3e2e10a3-80e5-43f5-940d-3c7b5ff59c20n%40googlegroups.com .

Reply all

Reply to author

Forward