PR
HNが思いつかん..
Sorry! Japanese and English only.
カレンダー
カテゴリ
10行エッセイ もしくは未分類・未編集
(236)10-line essays
(453)音楽10行エッセイ
(92)ライブレポ
(187)Music 10-line essays
(59)お知らせ Information
(46)お気に入り・お勧め紹介
(29)Favorite, recommendation
(90)自己紹介・ブログ紹介代用バトン
(21)日記代用バトン
(213)バトン置き場
(420)フリーページ
2015.10.20
カテゴリ： 10-line essays
A big-name actor married a younger actress.
This actor is famous as a singer, too, and there are many songs I like,
But I seldom watch TV and I know very little about this actor as actor ,
So I didn't have any feeling but surprise.
Today's story is NOT about this actor BUT how panjandrums showed true nature again related with this actor's marriage:
The chief cabinet secretary made a remark that women must have babies and contribute to nation , and aroused public censure.
No matter how this chief cabinet secretary tried to keep up appearances that the intention was a congratulatory address for this big-name couple ,
modern-time national mobilization act, which was at first a groundless suspicion .
In the first place, while they used to eliminate women from male-dominated society ingeniously, they demand contribution to nation at this late date ; What a misplaced self-seeking!
Equality of the gender? What has become equal is difficulty.
Surely, it's an instinct as living creatures to leave offspring, but is it "for someone else specific, including nation"? Not as if wartime
-On the second thought, who can declare that prewar never comes back again under current situation?
Once there was a minister who called women as birth-giving machine .
I'm afraid there seems to be little difference between current panjandrums and this minister .
It's also a matter of male and husbands and fathers to have babies and family , but I think I seldom hear responsibility of men is discussed.
As well as women, men and even people from abroad .
-Me? I would be the first one THEY sort as inferior goods.
Back to the beginning; I have no intention to demand the chief cabinet secretary retraction of remark.
All I'd like to ask is to admit plainly that their true goal is modern-time national mobilization act -if they say I'm wrong, then prove objectively so that I can correct misunderstanding.
No need to line up nice words, NO laying down negation.
And from now on, I'm going to vote for candidates who build society where people can live as people.
However, put it at the back of mind; society that don't treat people like real people could gather money temporary, but cannot attract people -even babies coming to Earth.
Based on a hypothesis of new-age that babies choose parents when they come to the world , lower birth late can mean that less and less babies choose this country.
At the same time...
You tell me that I cannot achieve anything with victim mentality? -Well, that's true.
◆ ：Ready to place summery if asked
This actor is famous as a singer, too, and there are many songs I like,
But I seldom watch TV and I know very little about this actor as actor ,
So I didn't have any feeling but surprise.
Today's story is NOT about this actor BUT how panjandrums showed true nature again related with this actor's marriage:
The chief cabinet secretary made a remark that women must have babies and contribute to nation , and aroused public censure.
No matter how this chief cabinet secretary tried to keep up appearances that the intention was a congratulatory address for this big-name couple ,
modern-time national mobilization act, which was at first a groundless suspicion .
In the first place, while they used to eliminate women from male-dominated society ingeniously, they demand contribution to nation at this late date ; What a misplaced self-seeking!
Equality of the gender? What has become equal is difficulty.
Surely, it's an instinct as living creatures to leave offspring, but is it "for someone else specific, including nation"? Not as if wartime
-On the second thought, who can declare that prewar never comes back again under current situation?
Once there was a minister who called women as birth-giving machine .
I'm afraid there seems to be little difference between current panjandrums and this minister .
It's also a matter of male and husbands and fathers to have babies and family , but I think I seldom hear responsibility of men is discussed.
As well as women, men and even people from abroad .
-Me? I would be the first one THEY sort as inferior goods.
Back to the beginning; I have no intention to demand the chief cabinet secretary retraction of remark.
All I'd like to ask is to admit plainly that their true goal is modern-time national mobilization act -if they say I'm wrong, then prove objectively so that I can correct misunderstanding.
No need to line up nice words, NO laying down negation.
And from now on, I'm going to vote for candidates who build society where people can live as people.
However, put it at the back of mind; society that don't treat people like real people could gather money temporary, but cannot attract people -even babies coming to Earth.
Based on a hypothesis of new-age that babies choose parents when they come to the world , lower birth late can mean that less and less babies choose this country.
At the same time...
You tell me that I cannot achieve anything with victim mentality? -Well, that's true.
◆ ：Ready to place summery if asked
お気に入りの記事を「いいね！」で応援しよう
[10-line essays] カテゴリの最新記事
-
Sequel: In order to draw people... 2025.11.09
-
Sequel: Enough is enough!! 2025.09.28
-
Sequel: Matter of appearances? 2025.08.31
【毎日開催】
15記事にいいね！で1ポイント
© Rakuten Group, Inc.
