12年ぶりの日本で、、

12年ぶりの日本で、、

HDLS-6



Abstract:

In recent decades, metaphors have been seen as the primary basis of abstract thinking for human beings. While in classic theory metaphors are regarded as just a matter of language, in contemporary theory such as cognitive linguistics, philosophy, anthropology, and psychology, they are thought of as a matter of cognition. Some researchers suggest that gestures also manifest metaphors (Calbris 1992, Cienki 1998, Ishino 2001, Kendon 1993, McNeill 1992, Webb 1996). The present study focuses upon gestural metaphors indicating anger among native Japanese speakers. Some researchers claim that metaphoric gestures, similar to linguistic elements, have loose form-meaning relationships, sub-components, and standards of form. This paper argues against this view. The present paper argues that metaphoric gestures are manifestations of underlying thinking (i.e., conceptual metaphor) which is grounded in our cultural or daily experiences, shared amongst the members of the same culture and/or society (cf. Lakoff and Johnson 1980, 1999). The results show that gestural metaphors and verbal metaphors share conceptual metaphors and metonymies which correspond to physiological effects of anger. These include increased body heat, blood pressure, and pulse, as shown by Lakoff and K嘛ecses (1987) in American English linguistic expressions. Furthermore, the results of the study suggest that especially for the Japanese culture, body parts play a major role in conceptualizing anger. Finally, these findings suggest that metaphoric gestures are based upon our daily (i.e., bodily and/or cultural) experiences.

References:

Calbris, Genevi竣e. 1990. Semiotics of French gesture. Bloomington: Indiana University
Press.
Cienki, Alan. 1998. Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric
expressions. In Jean-Pierre Koenig (ed.), Discourse and cognition, 189-204.
Stanford CA: CSLI Publications.
Ishino, Mika. 2001. Conceptual metaphors and metonymies of metaphoric gestures of
anger in discourse of native speakers of Japanese. In M. Andronis, C. Ball, H.
Elston, & S. Neuvel (eds.), Proceedings from the main session of the thirty-seventh meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 37-1: 259-273. Chicago Linguistic Society.
Kendon, Adam. 1988. How gestures can become like words. In Fernando Poyatos (ed.),
Cross-cultural perspectives in nonverbal communication, 131-141. Toronto: Hogrefe.
Kendon, Adam. 1993. Space, time, and gesture. D夙res 74: 3-16.
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its
challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, George, and Zolt? K嘛ecses. 1987. The cognitive model of anger inherent in
American English. In Dorothy C. Holland and Naomi Quinn (eds.), Cultural
models in language and thought, 195-221. New York: Cambridge University
Press.
McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago:
Webb, Rebecca A. 1996. Linguistic features of metaphoric gestures. Ph.D. dissertation,
University of Rochester, NY.

© Rakuten Group, Inc.
X

Design a Mobile Site
スマートフォン版を閲覧 | PC版を閲覧
Share by: