#ドゥルーズ Ce qui précède n'est pas lié au "scientisme". Il faut rappeler que Wittgenstein continuait de ressentir de la souffrance pour le dysfonctionnement du jeu de langage «philosophie» qui devrait englober à la fois le jeu de langage «science» et le langage courant.
posted at 13:24:08
2月17日
@dharmazeroalpha
永澤 護 アーカイブ archives@dharmazeroalpha
#ドゥルーズ Bien qu'il semble être l'objectif de donner au jeu de langage de la philosophie un statut plus élevé que la science, Que dire à propos de "Qu'est-ce que la philosophie?" de Deleuze=Guattari beaucoup de descriptions sur la science de qui sont absurdes?
posted at 10:40:24
2018年02月16日(金)2 tweets source
2月16日
@dharmazeroalpha
永澤 護 アーカイブ archives@dharmazeroalpha
#ウィトゲンシュタイン #ドゥルーズ Although it seems to be Goal to give the philosophy language game higher status than science, What is to say about "What is Philosophy ?" of Deleuze=Guattari many descriptions about science of which are absurd? (Think the pain of Wittgenstein.)
posted at 13:43:38
2月16日
@dharmazeroalpha
永澤 護 アーカイブ archives@dharmazeroalpha
#ドゥルーズガタリ #ドゥルーズ View from the pain of Wittgenstein, although it seems to be Goal to give the philosophy language game higher status than science, What is to say about "What is Philosophy?" of Deleuze=Guattari many descriptions about science of which are absurd?
#contemporarythought #Philosophy #Philosophie #Deleuze #ドゥルーズ #現代思想 Binomial confrontational ordering of "meat and bone" in his book "Francis Bacon - Logique de la sensation" seems #Catholic if it means something.
#現代思想 #ドゥルーズ #Philosophy #Philosophie Parce que #Deleuze utilise souvent la phrase et le mot "(action directe sur) le système nerveux" ou "cerveau" dans ce livre.
posted at 17:29:45
2月5日
@dharmazeroalpha
永澤 護 アーカイブ archives@dharmazeroalpha
#ドゥルーズ #Philosophy #Philosophie Quand pas de la vue du scientisme, quand #Deleuze remplace "émotion, c'est "sens"" dans son livre "Francis Bacon: logique de la sensation", Comment a-t-il pensé aux différences et aux relations entre le lobe pariétal et le système limbique?
#ドゥルーズ #現代思想 #哲学 #Deleuze Malgré la dépendance complètement au calcul de Leibniz, il ne sert à rien de dire que Leibniz finit par raté la cible parce que Leibniz n'a pas affirmé la «divergence elle-même» (dans le sens obscur de la récurrence éternelle de Nietzsche).
posted at 09:24:05
2018年01月29日(月)3 tweets source
1月29日
@dharmazeroalpha
永澤 護 アーカイブ archives@dharmazeroalpha
#ドゥルーズ Even though completely dependent on Leibniz's calculus, there is no point in saying that Leibniz eventually missed the target because Leibniz did not affirm "divergence itself" (in the unclear Nietzsche 's eternal recurrence's sense).
posted at 17:49:02
1月29日
@dharmazeroalpha
永澤 護 アーカイブ archives@dharmazeroalpha
#ドゥルーズ In other words, The thing from which Deleuze wanted to differentiate himself above all would be Phenomenology (and its family line philosophy). On the other hand Wittgenstein is nearly passed by.
posted at 17:13:35
1月29日
@dharmazeroalpha
永澤 護 アーカイブ archives@dharmazeroalpha
#ドゥルーズ Interesting thing is that condiderable inferiorization of the Phenomenology (as well as superiorization of his own position) in his book "Logique de la sensation" seems to suggest that he himself truly believed so, not a differentiation strategy.
posted at 17:11:37
2018年01月18日(木)1 tweet source
1月18日
@dharmazeroalpha
永澤 護 アーカイブ archives@dharmazeroalpha
#ドゥルーズ It's arbitrary the (statistical) level of the next differentiation of the ultimate real level:flow-particle (material-flow) is "molecular level". Also,the use of the word "statistical" will end up being caught irreversibly in the paradigm of quantum theory.
posted at 05:58:58
2018年01月06日(土)2 tweets source
1月6日
@dharmazeroalpha
永澤 護 アーカイブ archives@dharmazeroalpha
#仏陀 #ソクラテス #ドゥルーズ Buddha and Socrates stand at the same point in the practice of insight that staying in ignorance is the root of all disasters, but awareness of ignorance is already in the process of escape from there.For example,could Deleuze share that awareness?
posted at 21:12:00
1月6日
@dharmazeroalpha
永澤 護 アーカイブ archives@dharmazeroalpha
#ドゥルーズ #負債論 David Graeber reevaluates the "originality" of Nietzsche's "On the Genealogy of Morality(Zur Genealogie der Moral)" that has been overvalued since Deleuze-Guattari's "Anti-Oedipus", which actually shares the premise of Adam Smith and bourgeois economics.