Subaru vs. Honda Reliability: The More Reliable Brand Costs More to Own

Autoblog and Yahoo may earn commission from links in this article.

In July's inflation data, published this August, motor vehicle maintenance and repair was the third-largest transportation contributor to U.S. inflation, behind gasoline and airline fares. Motor vehicle insurance and used car values were the two largest items pulling the other way. Servicing a car is adding to inflation while insuring one is subtracting from it.

Reliability and running cost are separate measurements, and this pairing shows how sharply the two can diverge. If you plan to sell inside five years, Subaru's stronger reliability ranking may matter more. If you plan to keep the car well beyond the warranty period, Honda's lower ownership cost matters more.

Key Differences At A Glance

Subaru

• Twentieth of 29 brands on Consumer Reports' ten-year maintenance and repair cost

• Crosstrek named Most Dependable Small SUV in the J.D. Power 2026 Vehicle Dependability Study

• Two open recall campaigns covering more than 600,000 vehicles

• Standard all-wheel drive across the range

Honda

• Eleventh of 29 brands on the same ten-year cost measure, nine places ahead of Subaru

• No model-level award in the 2026 dependability study

• Front-wheel drive standard, all-wheel drive optional on most models

• Narrower hybrid lineup, all of it on high-volume models

Consumer Reports places Subaru second and Honda fourth in its 2026 predicted reliability ranking, a two-place gap covered in our four-brand Japanese reliability comparison .

Three Measures, Three Different Questions

The word reliability covers at least three things that get quoted interchangeably, and this comparison turns on the difference between them.

The cost figure is the one most often mistaken for a reliability score. Consumer Reports asks members for total maintenance and repairs together, which folds oil changes, tires and scheduled servicing into the same number as failures. A car that rarely breaks can still land high on that list if the routine work costs more. Standard all-wheel drive also gives Subaru more driveline hardware than a front-wheel-drive Honda, although the Consumer Reports data does not show how much that contributes to the cost gap.

The two studies also look at different vehicles and ownership periods. J.D. Power's study looks only at 2023 model-year vehicles after three years, so its results describe the outgoing versions of both lineups rather than what is in showrooms now.

The Ownership Cost Gap Is Nine Places Wide

Consumer Reports asks members what they paid out of pocket for total maintenance and repairs over the previous twelve months, then reports cumulative costs for years one through five, years six through ten, and the ten-year total. The current figures come from its 2025 Annual Auto Surveys. Collision repair is excluded, as is any adjustment for inflation or tariffs, so the ranking measures relative cost between brands rather than what a repair will cost next year.

Ranked by ten-year cost across 29 brands , Honda comes eleventh. Subaru comes twentieth, behind Kia, Chrysler, Jeep, Lexus, Cadillac, Volkswagen, Acura and GMC, and ahead of only Ram, Infiniti, Mini and the European luxury brands. Buick and Lincoln are the two cheapest, and Consumer Reports attributes their position to domestic parts costing less when repairs are needed.

Costs rise sharply once the warranty and any complimentary maintenance period expires, which for both Subaru and Honda means the second half of that ten-year window. Neither brand has a nationwide complimentary scheduled-maintenance program, so the comparison between them is not distorted the way it is for Toyota, Nissan and BMW.

Where The 2026 Problems Actually Come From

The J.D. Power 2026 U.S. Vehicle Dependability Study surveyed 33,268 original owners of 2023 model-year vehicles across 184 problem areas. The industry average worsened by 2 points to 204 problems per 100 vehicles , the highest count since the study was redesigned in 2022.

Almost none of it is mechanical.

• Infotainment was the worst of the nine categories at 56.7 PP100, followed by exterior at 27.5

• Four of the top five industry problems involve connecting a phone to the car

• Android Auto and Apple CarPlay connectivity led the industry for a third consecutive year at 8.9 PP100

• Bluetooth (5.5), wireless charging pads (5.1) and OEM app connectivity (4.7) bring the phone-related total to 24.2 PP100, nearly half the infotainment category

Software updates made things worse rather than better. Forty percent of owners received one in the previous twelve months, and of those, only 27% said it improved the vehicle while 58% noticed no difference at all. Sixty-three percent of those updates were delivered over the air, and they produced close to a 14% increase in problems, worth 2.5 PP100.

This matters for the Subaru and Honda comparison because it moves the question away from engines. Neither brand's powertrain engineering is what the modern dependability score is measuring. Screen behavior and phone pairing are, and that is a software problem both brands are still solving.

The Only Award In This Comparison Went To The Crosstrek

Neither Subaru nor Honda placed in the top three of either brand segment. Lexus led the premium field at 151 PP100 and Buick led the mass market at 160.

Subaru of America announced the Crosstrek was named Most Dependable Small SUV in America, arriving after a third consecutive J.D. Power Residual Value Award in the same segment. Subaru also cites Experian data showing 97% of Crosstreks sold in the past decade remain on the road.

Toyota Motor Corporation took the most model-level awards with eight, including the top model overall in the Lexus IS, and General Motors took four. Neither Honda nor Acura appears among the recipients J.D. Power named in its release.

The Crosstrek result is worth reading narrowly. It covers 2023 model-year cars after three years, so it describes the outgoing generation rather than the 2026 car with its new hybrid option, and it says nothing about the rest of the Subaru range.

Two Open Subaru Recalls

Subaru is recalling 541,237 vehicles in the United States over an incorrect Gross Axle Weight Rating printed on the federal certification label, covering certain 2026 Crosstrek Hybrid, 2025 to 2026 Forester and Forester Hybrid, and 2019 to 2026 Ascent models. Owner letters are scheduled for late August 2026. No mechanical repair is involved, no crashes or injuries have been linked to it, and the remedy is a corrected label.

A separate campaign covers 69,663 Foresters for a moonroof glass panel that may detach. That one does require dealer inspection and is the more consequential of the two despite the far smaller number of vehicles.

Recall volume is a poor proxy for reliability in either direction. A label error affecting half a million cars carries less owner risk than a detaching glass panel affecting one seventh as many.

Which One Is For You

Subaru holds the better survey position and the only model award in this pairing. Honda holds the cheaper decade. Neither result undercuts the other, and which one governs the decision depends entirely on how long the car stays in the driveway.

Sources:Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index for July 2026, released 12 August 2026, and Bureau of Transportation Statistics Transportation Consumer Price Index for July 2026; J.D. Power 2026 U.S. Vehicle Dependability Study press release, 12 February 2026, jdpower.com; Subaru of America media release, 17 February 2026, media.subaru.com; Consumer Reports, "Car Brands Ranked by Maintenance and Repair Costs Over Time," 4 December 2025, consumerreports.org; NHTSA recall campaign records.

This story was originally published by Autoblog on Aug 23, 2026, where it first appeared. Add Autoblog as a Preferred Source by clicking here.