Yahoo
Advertisement
Advertisement
Bolde

Psychology says people who pack more than they need are sometimes reacting to a childhood where no one was coming to save them if they forgot the essentials

Erika Vaatainen
8 min read
  • Overpacking can be a learned behavior from childhood experiences where needing something and not having it had personal consequences.

My friend Elena once packed for a two-night trip the way most people pack for a month abroad. Two bags. Both almost full. Items laid out in careful rows before anything went in—backup versions of things she already had, a small zipper pouch of things she probably wouldn't need but couldn't bring herself to leave behind. I watched her fold and refold the same cardigan and thought: this is not about the cardigan.

"I just don't want to get there and realize I forgot something," she said. Not casually. Like forgetting something wouldn't just be an inconvenience. Like it would be a problem she'd have to solve entirely on her own.

And that's the thing. For Elena, and for a lot of people who pack the way she does, that's exactly what forgetting has always meant. Not a minor inconvenience someone else helps you sort out. A gap you're responsible for closing yourself. Because growing up, that's how it worked. You thought of it in advance, or you went without.

Advertisement
Advertisement

There wasn't a net.

The overpacking isn't about the trip . It's about what they learned to expect when things go wrong.

They grew up in homes where forgetting had real consequences

A woman overpacking clothes for her vacation.
Shutterstock

Not necessarily dramatic ones. Sometimes it was subtle. A parent who didn't notice, or couldn't manage to notice, or was too overwhelmed by their own life to track what their kid might need. A household where the adults were present but not quite available—where they could be standing right in front of someone and still feel like they were on their own.

In those environments, forgetting something didn't lead to help.

It led to consequences they managed themselves.

And children are remarkably good at learning what the rules actually are, even when no one says them out loud. The rule they learned was: think of it before you need it. Because needing something you don't have and having no one to turn to is a particular kind of alone. And if you could just prepare well enough—just think far enough ahead—you might be able to avoid that feeling altogether.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Research by psychologist Gabriele Oettingen, published in Psychological Science, found that people who habitually anticipate obstacles engage in more detailed planning—and when that tendency combines with a belief that outcomes depend entirely on personal preparation, readiness tips into over-preparation. Not because the situation requires it.

Because the internal calculus was set long ago.

They learned that asking for help didn't really work

Maybe they asked. Maybe someone said yes and then didn't follow through. Maybe they were told they were being dramatic, or that they should have thought of it themselves, or that the problem wasn't actually a problem. Maybe the help came with so many strings attached that it cost more than just handling it alone.

When that's the pattern, they stop asking.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Not consciously. They just quietly absorb the lesson that asking creates more problems than it solves. That the most reliable path is to need as little as possible from anyone.

Overpacking is that lesson made physical. If the bag has everything, they don't have to ask. Don't have to depend. Don't have to be in the position of needing something from someone who may or may not come through.

The bag isn't just luggage. It's a way of making sure they never have to find out what happens if they ask and no one shows up.

Being prepared was how they earned safety

In some homes, being on top of things wasn't just a good trait.

It was a way of staying out of trouble.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The kid who remembered things, managed things, handled things quietly—that kid didn't create problems for already-stressed adults. That kid was easier to love, or at least easier to be around. So they got good at it. Really good. And the better they got, the more it became part of who they were rather than something they were doing.

I think about Elena not just in the context of travel but in how she moves through the world generally. Always early. Always with backup plans. Always with a quiet version of "but what if" running underneath whatever she's doing. It doesn't read as anxious from the outside.

It reads as competent. Capable. Like someone who has it together.

Which is exactly what it was supposed to look like.

They never learned that problems could be solved in the moment

Some people forget their toothbrush and think: I'll grab one at the drugstore. Minor inconvenience. Easily solved.

Advertisement
Advertisement

That response requires something underneath it. A belief that solutions will be available. That the situation is recoverable. That they're not going to be stuck.

Other people never developed that belief , because the evidence in their childhood didn't support it. Solutions weren't always available. Situations weren't always recoverable. Being stuck was sometimes just what happened when you weren't prepared enough.

So they prepare more. And more.

Not because they're anxious by nature. Because they grew up in environments where winging it had consequences, and the consequences landed on them.

Susan Folkman, a psychologist whose research on stress and coping has been published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, found that people who feel personally responsible for managing potential problems tend to address them before they arise rather than respond in the moment—because in the moment has never felt like a safe place to be.

Advertisement
Advertisement

What I noticed with Elena wasn't just the volume of what she packed. It was how little space she left for things to be figured out later. Everything accounted for in advance. As if trusting that it would work out wasn't something she'd had a lot of practice doing.

The "just in case" followed them out of childhood

The thing about strategies that kept you safe when you were young is that they don't check in with you later to see if they're still needed.

They just keep running.

So the vigilance that made sense in a home where help was unreliable shows up now in the way they pack—but also in the way they plan, the way they work, the way they move through situations that don't actually require this level of preparation. The backup plans that weren't optional once are now just how they operate. The early arrivals. The detailed contingencies for things that probably won't happen.

Advertisement
Advertisement

It doesn't feel anxious from the inside. It feels responsible. It feels like being the kind of person who doesn't get caught off guard.

The bag gets unpacked at the end of the trip. The vigilance doesn't.

Preparedness became their identity because it had to

At some point—usually early, usually before they had much say in it—being the one who thought of everything stopped being a strategy.

It became a self-concept.

The reliable one. The organized one. The one who had what you needed if you needed it. That role got reinforced constantly. People praised it. Depended on it. And somewhere along the way, being prepared stopped feeling like something they did and started feeling like something they were.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Which makes it much harder to put down.

They can unpack when they get home. They can't as easily un-become the person who doesn't forget things, who doesn't need help, who has it covered before anyone thinks to ask. Because that person isn't just a habit. That person is what a whole childhood of not having a net produced.

And dismantling it means asking a question they've rarely had to sit with: what happens if I don't prepare for everything? What if I just trust that it'll work out?

For some people, that question is easy. For people who grew up learning the hard way that it might not—it's anything but.

The bag is always packed for a version of home that no longer exists

Overpacking isn't irrational.

Advertisement
Advertisement

It was, at some point, a completely reasonable response to a real environment.

An environment where the adults weren't reliably available. Where forgetting something had costs that landed on you personally. Where the gap between needing something and getting it was filled by your own resourcefulness or not at all. Where asking for help was either not an option or not worth the cost of asking.

That environment is over. Most of the time, the people who grew up in it are living somewhere safer now—with more support, more resources, more people who would actually help if they asked. The circumstances changed. The relationships changed. The stakes changed entirely.

But the nervous system doesn't just update because the zip code changed.

It keeps packing for the old place. Keeps running the old math. Keeps operating as if the rules that applied then still apply now, even when the evidence suggests otherwise.

The one where nobody was coming if they forgot something. Where being prepared wasn't a preference.

It was how they made sure they'd be okay.

Advertisement
Mobilize your Website
View Site in Mobile | Classic
Share by: