'A huge invasion of privacy': Louisiana parish disputes private camera ban in public rights-of-way

- Livingston Parish Council in Louisiana is considering a proposal to restrict privately owned security and surveillance cameras in parish-owned rights-of-way.
A Louisiana parish is still weighing how aggressively to curb the use of private surveillance technology on parish rights-of-way after a proposed ban prompted objections from a resident and council members.
On Aug. 27, 2026, the Livingston Parish Council chose not to act immediately on a proposal that would restrict privately owned security and surveillance cameras in parish-owned rights-of-way, according to The Livingston Parish News .
Here's what to know
Introduced by Councilman Ryan Chavers, Ordinance 26-20 would prohibit private security and surveillance cameras from parish-maintained rights-of-way. Chavers said the measure should not be read as a total prohibition on cameras.
"No one is banning anyone from having a camera," he said, according to the paper. "All we're saying in this ordinance is don't put it in the parish right-of-way."
At the center of the discussion were competing concerns about privacy, property rights, and public safety.
Speaking against the proposal, Frog's at Magnolia Beach owner Garry Talbert said it was too broad and argued that "the only person that should be concerned about a license plate reader is an individual that's breaking the law," according to the Parish News.
Chavers and Councilwoman Erin Sandefur instead emphasized the dangers they see in artificial intelligence-enabled camera systems, warning that the technology can be misused, hacked, or expanded far beyond its original purpose.
The publication reported Sandefur said that "there are some pretty sick people that misuse these cameras," and Chavers warned that unchecked growth could become "a huge invasion of privacy."
More background
The dispute in Livingston Parish reflects a national debate over where surveillance belongs and who gets to control it.
Cameras that read license plates or use AI tools can help investigators solve crimes, but they also raise concerns about constant monitoring, data retention, and whether people are being watched in spaces they consider part of their neighborhoods.
Even while saying he is "not totally against camera systems" and that "they do help solve crimes," the Parish News reported Councilman Dean Coates added that "our constitution does prohibit invasion of privacy."
The AI component adds another layer beyond privacy concerns alone.
As communities adopt more AI-linked tools, the potential benefits come with risks, including security vulnerabilities and misuse of data.
What's being done?
Livingston Parish is taking a slower approach. Instead of approving the measure or discarding it, council members opted for more discussion and clarification before bringing it back after revisions, the Parish News reported.
Chavers said the ordinance would be prospective rather than retroactive and would mostly affect new subdivision development, per the paper. He also said existing cameras believed to be privately owned would remain in place even if they sit in a parish right-of-way.
"Where are we going to be in five years?" Chavers asked. "Are we gonna get to a point to where they're at every intersection, every median, every right-of-way, every yard, every house? What point are we gonna… stand up and say enough is enough?"
Coates echoed the need for limits.
"We need to make sure that, before we allow it to get out of control, we put some constraints on it," he declared, as the Parish News reported .
Where can I learn more?
Livingston Parish is hardly alone in wrestling with how far AI-linked technology should reach into daily life, or who gets to draw the line. Similar fights are playing out elsewhere as lawmakers and residents debate oversight, local planning, and whether public safeguards are keeping pace.
• In Congress, a controversial AI rollback is advancing despite warnings about public harms.
• In California, lawmakers seek data-center water-use transparency as communities plan for tech growth.
• In Chile, residents say data centers are prioritized over farming communities and basic needs.
Each of these stories gets at the same basic question facing Livingston Parish: how to set limits before a fast-moving technology becomes part of everyday life. What sounds like a policy debate on paper can quickly turn into a local fight over privacy, resources, and public control.
Get TCD's free newsletters for easy tips, smart advice, and a chance to earn $5,000 toward home upgrades. To see more stories like this one, change your Google preferences here .
