איצט מיט די פטירה פון אלטע קומט אריין די בשורה אז א איד איד איז שטארק נתרגש געווארן און דערביי באוויליגט צו מנציח זיין די רענאוואציע לע"נ. זאל אים די זכות ביישטיין.
פינאנץ מיניסטער האט געשריבן:
סאיז דא רבנים וואס האלטן אז ממעג אויספלאגן א קינד וואס איז ברעין דעמעזשד?
חס ושלום, חס ושלום חס ושלום נאר פארן שרייבן אזא זאך מיט א פראגע צייכן, ברעין דעמעדזשד? ברעין דעמעדזשד איז נאך זיכער לעבעדיג לכל דבר, לויט קיין שום הוה אמינא. אויספלאגן? חס ושלום. לענין זה פון אלטע פיקסלער דירעקטלי וואלט איך גאר שטארק מציע געווען שרייבט נישט און פרעגט נישט פאר איר הערט דעם טאטנס אינטערוויו, סאיז דא דא א לינק דערצו. אויב ווילט איר סתם שפעקולירן און שרייבן היכי תמצי'ס מיט א גרויסע ווארענונג מיט רויטע בוכשטאבן קיינער זאל חס ושלום נישט מאכן אפילו קיין פיצעלע באשלוסן אין עניני פיקוח נפש און דן זיין דיני נפשות באזירט אויף א געשרייבעכץ קען עס זיין אפשר גאנץ ב'טעמ'טע ידיעות מיט לומדות וכו'.
אויף דעם וואלט איך געשריבן אז איר זענט פאראינטערסירט צו אלע רבנים האלטן איינשטימיג אז מען "מוז" טון כל מה שביכלתם צו אפהאלטן גויים פון אויספלאגן א קינד וואס איז ברעין דעמעדזשד.
סיין זיך אויף מיט די לינק צו Webull stocks platform, און איך און די וועלן פארדינען free stocks נאכן deposit $100 די ערשטע 30 טעג פון אויפסיינעןhttps://act.webull.com/nt/1tSOfvYQhs4K/
זעה איך אז עס איז דא א גאנצע מערכה בנוגע די שרעקליכע מציאות
פון די גארדיען
Archie Battersbee joins a list of tragic cases of children in which the courts have been called to take the grave decision on whether life support treatment should be withdrawn.
Having a child suffer an injury that leaves them attached to a machine and a shadow of the lively child they were previously is every parent’s worst nightmare. As a result, cases such as Charlie Gard, Alfie Evans, Isaiah Haastrup, Tafida Raqeeb and Alta Fixler have struck a chord with the public.
Tafida’s was the only one with a seemingly happy ending. A judge disagreed with doctors at the Royal London hospital and allowed the brain-damaged girl – unlike Archie she was not deemed to be brain-stem dead – to travel to Italy for treatment, where she recovered sufficiently to be removed from intensive care.
Hers and other cases, which remain rare, end up in court because there has been a disagreement between doctors and parents about whether to continue treatment. In those circumstances either party – in the Gard case, it was Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS trust – can apply for the court to adjudicate.
The emotions generated by such cases have often led to legal proceedings happening in a highly charged atmosphere. Upsetting allegations and even threats have been levelled at doctors and nurses by parties not involved in proceedings.
It is therefore no surprise that according to Lady Finlay, a crossbench peer and professor of palliative medicine, the government is said to be considering an inquiry into different ways of handling such cases, for example independent mediation.
She told Times Radio on Monday: “I’m hoping that by the end of the summer we’ll have an inquiry into different ways of handling these very, very difficult cases so that there is independent mediation.
“And I say independent because, if it’s supplied by the hospital, or it’s supplied by the parents, one side may feel mistrustful of the other. But to be in the situation of adversarial conflict doesn’t help anybody.”
She added that “where lawyers get involved, things escalate, and it gets harder and harder to communicate between the doctor and the parents as to what’s happening”.
Mediation sounds sensible but it requires sign-on from all involved and that may be easier said than done. For parents it can seem like a simple but horrific binary choice: their child either lives or dies. Additionally, recent years have brought increasing intervention by religious groups purporting to support parents but who have also been accused of inflaming tensions.
In Charlie’s case, the US pastor Rev Patrick Mahoney, a fervent anti-abortion campaigner and former national spokesperson for Operation Rescue, an anti-abortion group with links to violence at clinics and against abortion providers, flew to London to act as self-appointed spokesperson for the parents.
Archie’s parents have been supported by the Christian Legal Centre, who were also involved in Alfie’s case, in which Mr Justice Hayden described Pavel Stroilov, the centre law student representing Alfie’s parents, as a “fanatical and deluded young man” whose submissions to the court were “littered with vituperation and bile” that was “inconsistent with the real interests of the parents’ case”.
Stroilov was behind the attempt by Alfie’s parents to pursue a private prosecution for murder against three Alder Hey doctors. Archie’s mother has referred to the withdrawal of life support as a “choreographed execution”. Bruno Quintavalle, a barrister who has been involved in Alfie’s and Archie’s cases, was a leader of anti-abortion group ProLife Alliance and previously brought a case in his own name challenging cell cloning.
The involvement of such third-party ideologues presents a significant obstacle to the laudable aim of resolving such sensitive cases in a less adversarial manner.
This article was amended on 2 August 2022. The legal case concerning Charlie Gard involved Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS trust rather than Barts NHS trust.
אגב. עס וועט זיין א גרויסע קידוש ה' אויב הרב פיקסלער וועט זיך אריבערכאפן קיין וועסטקליף / Southend, צו מחזק זיין די Battersbee פאמיליע אין זייער שווערע מאמענטן. שמעתי אז הרב פיקסלער האט א שוואגער אין וועסטקליף.
.
לייף אינשורענס אן קיין בלוט-טעסט גרינגערהייט. רופט/טעקסט די ווארט INFO צו 718-480-0545#קהלֵב
אגב. עס וועט זיין א גרויסע קידוש ה' אויב הרב פיקסלער וועט זיך אריבערכאפן קיין וועסטקליף / Southend, צו מחזק זיין די Battersbee פאמיליע אין זייער שווערע מאמענטן. שמעתי אז הרב פיקסלער האט א שוואגער אין וועסטקליף.
קען זיין.
אבער לדעתי מיין איך אז שוין צייט צו לאזן דעם טאטן לעבן זיין לעבן פריוואט. ער איז ארויסגעקומען אויף די גאס צו ראטעווען זיין קינד. גענוג וויאזוי ס'האט זיך ליידער געענדיגט. יעצט לאמיר נישט זיין זיינע עצה געבער ברבים.
Archie Battersbee’s family claim they have been refused a request for the brain-damaged boy to be moved to a hospice for life support to be turned off.
They also say two other countries have offered to care for their son, who British doctors and courts say should be taken off treatment.
The High Court has given medics permission to stop treating the 12-year-old despite his parents’ wishes, saying this was in Archie’s best interests.
A London hospital was set to turn off life support from 11am on Wednesday, following weeks of legal disputes over his care.
But Hollie Dance, his mother, said it had agreed to hold off while the European Court of Human Rights considered the family’s latest bid for a delay - submitted the same morning.
She said the family wanted Archie to go to a hospice in the “worst-case scenario” and had asked the hospital to allow this.
“This hospital brutally said no,” Ms Dance told reporters outside the Royal London Hospital on Wednesday morning.
“The courts are really focusing on the word dignity. What is dignified in dying in a busy hospital room, full of noise, with the door open [and] people coming in and out continuously, when Archie could be in a very peaceful garden with squirrels and wildlife running arund to have his life support withdrawn there?
“If they really want to focus on this word dignity, I think that option seriously needs to also be looked at.”
A family friend described his conditions in the hospital on Tuesday,saying there were “seven or eight” security guards outside the brain-damaged boy’s room.
“If this is Archie’s last couple of days it needs to be peaceful and it needs to be a calm atmosphere, and it’s the complete opposite really,” Ella Carter told reporters outside the London hospital.
Ms Dance said on Wednesday the family had been offered treatment in Italy and Japan for their son.
.
לייף אינשורענס אן קיין בלוט-טעסט גרינגערהייט. רופט/טעקסט די ווארט INFO צו 718-480-0545#קהלֵב