by: Bee Delores
Last Updated: January 5, 2025
6 min read
6 min read
By continuing to use this website you agree to our terms and conditions . If you don't agree with our terms and conditions, you are not permitted to continue using this website.
In a cinematic universe where movies are getting longer and budgets are skyrocketing, Marvel Studios’ latest entry, The Marvels , has turned heads for an entirely different reason. With a runtime of just 105 minutes , it’s officially the shortest movie in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU).
Yet, it’s not just its length that’s making waves—it’s also the jaw-dropping cost per minute. With a reported budget of $220 million, The Marvels might just be the priciest blockbuster ever made in terms of runtime efficiency.
Dive into how director Nia DaCosta’s bold approach is rewriting the rules of modern filmmaking, and what this means for the future of Hollywood!
At a compact 105 minutes, The Marvels stands out in a landscape where modern blockbusters often cross the two-hour mark—and then some. It dethrones Thor: The Dark World (112 minutes) as the shortest MCU film, setting a new precedent for the franchise.
But what led to this decision? Director Nia DaCosta has been vocal about her intent to keep the film’s runtime lean. “I really wanted it to be under two hours,” DaCosta told Digital Spy. “There’s no need to make a movie longer if you don’t have to. One hour and 45 minutes is pretty average for a film.”
Her argument isn’t just about efficiency; it’s about impact. In a time where audiences often feel fatigued by overly long blockbusters, DaCosta’s approach could signal a refreshing change.
The $220 million budget for The Marvels is undoubtedly hefty, especially for a film with such a short runtime. To put it into perspective, that’s approximately $2.1 million per minute.
This makes The Marvels one of the most expensive films per minute in cinema history, particularly for movies under two hours. For comparison, other high-budget films like Tangled (under two hours, $260 million) and The Lion King (2019 remake, $250 million) also commanded steep costs.
However, neither film managed to eclipse The Marvels in cost-per-minute efficiency. The big question is: where did the money go?
Blockbusters like The Marvels carry monumental expenses , from high-caliber cast salaries—including Oscar-winner Brie Larson—to cutting-edge visual effects. Add in marketing and distribution, and the numbers skyrocket.
Unlike traditional dramas, superhero films rely on VFX-heavy sequences, which can be astonishingly expensive. From intergalactic battles to CGI-rendered superpowers, every second of screen time comes with a hefty price tag.
Considering the MCU’s reputation for visual grandeur, it’s no surprise that much of the budget was allocated to ensuring the film met its ambitious creative vision.
To fully appreciate The Marvel’s brevity, consider the trend of sprawling epics dominating the box office. In the past year alone, audiences witnessed several cinematic marathons:
While these films leaned into their extended runtimes to tell complex stories, DaCosta opted for the opposite approach. Her decision aligns more closely with the pacing of 2023’s Barbie (114 minutes) and The Super Mario Bros. Movie (92 minutes), both of which proved that shorter runtimes could still deliver blockbuster-level impact.
Even classics like Home Alone (106 minutes) remind us that a tightly edited runtime doesn’t equate to a lack of storytelling depth.
The decision to make The Marvels compact wasn’t just about keeping things snappy; it also reflects an understanding of modern audience preferences. Moviegoers today have more entertainment options than ever, from streaming services to video games.
The traditional “attention economy” has led filmmakers to question whether longer movies risk alienating their audiences. DaCosta’s strategy could appeal to fans looking for a quick, action-packed escape without the commitment of a multi-hour runtime.
It’s a reminder that impactful storytelling doesn’t require an extended runtime—just smart, concise writing and execution.
Film | Runtime (Minutes) | Budget (Million USD) | Cost Per Minute (Million USD) |
---|---|---|---|
The Marvels
|
105 | 220 | 2.1 |
Thor: Love and Thunder
|
119 | 250 | 2.1 |
Black Panther: Wakanda Forever
|
161 | 250 | 1.55 |
Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness
|
126 | 200 | 1.59 |
While The Marvels edges close to Thor: Love and Thunder in cost per minute, its shorter runtime cements its position as the MCU’s cost-efficiency king.
As much as The Marvels is a statement on runtime, it’s also a reflection of broader industry trends. Hollywood’s obsession with lengthy films has often been tied to notions of prestige and value.
A longer movie traditionally signals a bigger “event” for audiences, offering more bang for their buck. Yet, shorter films like The Marvels challenge this assumption.
They’re proving that compact runtimes can still offer engaging experiences—and potentially higher returns. Shorter films can mean more showtimes per day, which can boost box office revenues.
They’re also less daunting for viewers, encouraging repeat visits.
As audience preferences shift and streaming platforms continue to disrupt traditional cinema, shorter, high-impact films like The Marvels could become the norm. With the rise of bite-sized entertainment on platforms like TikTok, there’s a growing appetite for concise storytelling that doesn’t compromise on quality.
While sprawling epics like Oppenheimer and Avatar will always have their place, there’s room for a diverse range of runtimes in modern filmmaking. After all, it’s not about how long a movie is—it’s about how memorable it feels.
Lover of hiking, biking, horror movies, cats and camping. Writer at Wide Open Country, Holler and Nashville Gab.
We appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback about this page with us.
Whether it's praise for something good, or ideas to improve something that
isn't quite right, we're excited to hear from you.