Every time I hear about this, I feel like questioning to participants: At the latest national election, the voting late was only 52%, which means about half of qualified voters didn't vote
. Are those participants the ones who voted at that election?
If they didn't vote, it's abused of them to complain now -If they regret of abstention and determine that they are voting from the next election, things could be different, though. I'm placing this because I voted at this election I heard on the radio that people are included who join to learn about right to collective self-defense -and I would be also the one who must learn. And... I must confess: -at the same time, I could appreciate as for the foreign policy by the current prime minister,
When I heard three necessary requirements, once I was leaning toward to admit that approving the use of the right to collective self-defense could be inevitable. Especially an expression of responding to changes of the times
deluded me. Then... today, I'm writing this in this language after all -so I'd like to place a question: The current abuses in government might be blatant, and I suppose I could have a little comprehension to apprehensions the neighboring continent country and peninsular country are having, But have they everreflectedon themselves that they might be the ones that give an excuse to the current prime minister's unquestioningly self-righteous
? In short...this time, I'd like to suspect that if this cabinet decision really means that our country could be pulled into wars by other large countries in the future, it could be the result incurred partly by people indifferent to politics and countries that break international rules blatantly
... This is all I can question and mention at this point.