All the Games Count

April 13, 2015 by · 5 Comments

Every game matters, whether it is played in the first week or in the last. It is easy to dismiss the significance of the first weeks of the season, but trends emerge even as early as Spring Training that will haunt the sixth months to follow. The Washington Nationals trip north to Fenway Park was hinted early on as a first look at two teams that could well end up facing one another in the World Series. That notion took a serious beating on Monday when the two teams played an afternoon game that begged the question whether one of them belonged any where near the pinnacle of the game. The Nationals embarrassed themselves with continued sloppy play and lost Game One, 9-4, and the score doesn’t do the affair justice.

Washington’s schedule has been rated the easiest in baseball as they are reputed to be head and shoulders above the rest of the NL East, from whom they ran away in 2014 and finished up by 17 games over the closest competition. The Phillies and the Mets did not get the memo, because the lightweights put a beating on the erstwhile Champs taking two of three games and making the Nationals look bad in the doing. Washington could barely dent the scoreboard and though they had the lead behind fine starting pitching, they fumbled the ball repeatedly and squeaked out the final game against the Phillies only when they managed to score four runs–their most prodigious output of the season.

Where did that power house team go that Washington was fielding this year?

The injuries will be the first thing that loyalists will point to. Denard Span, Anthony Rendon, and Jayson Werth started the season on the disabled list and Span and Rendon will likely not return until the first of May. With confidence pundits will say that the Nationals will gain their stride when these players are healthy and will easily coast to victory in the five months of baseball after their return. It is the safe bet, but the first week of the season gives reason to wonder. The inability to fill behind those players adequately is symptomatic of part of the problem and one reason red flags should be hoisted over the Nationals one week into the season. The problems may have deeper origins that the absence of three players have just revealed.

The biggest problem has been the inability to score runs. The team with the largest run differential in the National League during the 2014 season, has averaged just slightly more than 2 runs per game so far this year and while the starting pitching has been everything it was supposed to be, the team is managing to find ways to lose despite them.

As good as the 2014 Nationals were, the weak links were visible for anyone to see in the playoffs. Drew Storen took over as the team’s closer and had a nice run to get the team into the playoffs, but he could not get the one out necessary to put away the San Francisco Giants after Jordan Zimmermann’s masterful Game 2 of the NLDS. The press blamed Matt Williams for asking so much of Storen and they got away with it clean. But the bigger problem was the anemic attack that could not mount any threat against the Giants pitching staff. Both the Washington bullpen and its offense have picked up where the team left off in October.

Rather than spend money to add a convincing middle of the order presence or bring in a bona fide closer, Mike Rizzo pushed all of his chips into the middle of the table to acquire Max Scherzer. Adam LaRoche took his bat elsewhere and the biggest addition the team made behind him was Yunel Escobar. The marginal benefit of adding the Cy Young winner to the best rotation in baseball has been second guessed early and often. But watching the Nationals play behind Scherzer, this curious and quirky decision to pay over $200 million for one player demands further attention.

The best answer to surface is that the Nationals do not trust the Tommy John repaired arms of Jordan Zimmermann and Steven Strasburg. The average life expectancy of a repaired elbow is seven or eight years and both pitchers will be nearing that benchmark in the next few seasons. Zimmermann will command a healthy contract if he continues to pitch as he has for the past three years, but it has become clear he will not return to DC. So the move to bring in Scherzer is one for the long term competitiveness of the team. Viewed from that angle the signing makes sense, but it does nothing to improve the 2015 team that many still regard as the best overall.

The other notable player who will likely follow J-Zimm is Ian Desmond who was offered a long term contract but found it wanting. Watching Desmond’s play at shortstop in the first few games of the season, a casual observer would think the Nationals dodged a bullet. Desmond has always made more errors than a championship caliber middle infielder should, but he has won Silver Sluggers for the past three consecutive seasons and those gaudy figures are among the ones that have caused everyone to pencil the Nationals into the top slot again in the National League East. But the whole of the player will be judged at the end of the day and for all the talk of Desmond’s leadership skills, he has yet to prove them in the heat of it.

On Monday afternoon at Fenway the Nationals were every bit as atrocious as they were during the first week. The second week promises no respite as two young outfielders played a pop fly into a two run double and Desmond continued his sloppy play and record setting strikeout rate. So far there are more questions than answers in DC and one wonders whether Anthony Rendon and Denard Span can save Matt Williams’ bacon? Can a team with so many players looking at the exit really put it all together for one final run? There is plenty of time to send the script back to re-write, but all of the games count and living down the first week of play may require heavy sedation if it gets any worse.

Comments

5 Responses to “All the Games Count”
  1. Alan feinberg says:

    As usual, you’ve nailed it. As a Nats fan, sadly, I couldn’t agree more. To me, Desmond has been pressing for three seasons. The perennially weak bench apparently has never been a concern of Mike Rizzo. Situational hitting remains a concept foreign to Washington players. Even though the manager can’t make the plays for the players, he can show leadership and authority and bench Desmond or any of the other under performing ballplayers. His reluctance to do that is mystifying.

  2. Alan, I like Matt Williams as a manager, but I was shocked when we were ahead of the Phillies 2-0 in the eighth inning and we had the first two runners on base and no outs with Yunel Escobar at the plate I believe. Rather than have him bunt the runners over, he made an out that failed to move them and we lost that game 3-2 in extra innings if memory serves–which it does not always. To me that was a more eqregious call than bringing Storen in last season and my faith in the Big Marine is beginning to flag. Desmond has committed numerous errors to start the season for several years now. In 2012 he followed that with a long stretch without a single error, although last season he never completely righted the ship and finished with 24 errors. I like Desmond as a ball player and a person, but I don’t believe he prepares for the season particularly well and given the way the team has started in recent years, that critique might apply more generally as well. I actually like the bench this year better than past years and hope Clint Robinson continues his feel good story. My one question is Tyler Moore and why we hang onto him. “Detwiler didn’t get a fair shot” and “Tyler Moore would hit 20 homers if he got regular playing time” are two of the least supportable contentions regularly made by fans at Nationals Park.

    The encouraging signs are Zimmerman’s play at first and the two dingers which suggest he can still hit for power, and then there is Scherzer’s pitching. This is still a very good team, but the level of play to date has been truly embarrassing and we can only hope they dig within themselves and find the gifted athletes that are there waiting to get out.

  3. Marc Hall says:

    Generally I have been supportive of Rizzo’s moves but this last off season left me scratching my head. The Nats desperately needed a big middle of the order bat yet spent big on a pitcher.

  4. Rizzo’s off-season moves have more to do with 2016 than 2015 and that is what is so perplexing. With so many of the pieces in place for a pennant run in 2015, why not go all in for that, why not pick up an Andrew Miller to solidify the bullpen and something more substantial than Yunel Escobar at 2b? C’est la vie; we shall see.

  5. @Alan feinberg – Maybe Desmond belongs in the outfield.

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar !

Mobilize your Site
View Site in Mobile | Classic
Share by: