Social innovation and Nelson’s evolutionary legacy on social technologies

  1. Solano, Ernesto 1
  2. Gallego, Jorge 2
  3. Rubalcaba, Luis 1
  1. 1 Departament of Economics and Business, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Spain
  2. 2 Department of Business Organization and GIPTIC, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Revista :
Journal of Industrial and Business Economics

ISSN : 0391-2078 1972-4977

Año de publicación : 2025

Tipo : Artículo

Otras publicaciones en : Journal of Industrial and Business Economics

Resumen

This paper examines the relevance of Richard R. Nelson’s evolutionary economics for advancing the study of social innovation. While Nelson did not explicitly formulate a theory of social innovation, his concepts of social technologies, institutional dynamics, and collective learning offer a robust framework for understanding innovation as a collaborative, participatory, and context-dependent process. By situating innovation within broader institutional and societal contexts, Nelson’s approach shifts attention from isolated technical advances to the collective routines and governance arrangements that sustain systemic change. The analysis highlights how social technologies—standardized ways of organizing cooperation, decision-making, and value co-creation—interact with physical technologies to shape both economic and social outcomes. The paper explores how Nelson’s theoretical legacy provides important analytical tools for conceptualizing social innovation as a transformative process, illuminating how inclusive collaboration and institutional adaptation are central to addressing contemporary societal challenges.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abdolhosseinzadeh, M., Mohammadi, F., & Abdolhamid, M. (2023). Identifying and prioritizing barriers and challenges of social innovation implementation in the public sector. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 8(1), 56–72.
  • Aksoy, L., Alkire, L., Choi, S., Kim, P. B., & Zhang, L. (2019). Social innovation in service: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Service Management, 30(3), 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-11-2018-0376
  • Ashta, A., Couchoro, M., & Musa, A. S. M. (2014). Dialectic evolution through the social innovation process: From microcredit to microfinance. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 4.
  • Ayob, N., Teasdale, S., & Fagan, K. (2016). How social innovation came to be: Tracing the evolution of a contested concept. Journal of Social Policy, 45(4), 635–653. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004727941600009X
  • Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: Moving the field forward: A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008
  • Chalmers, D. (2012). Social innovation: An exploration of the barriers faced by innovating organizations in the social economy. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 28(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094212463677
  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business.
  • Evers, A., & Ewert, B. (2015). Social innovation for social cohesion. In A. Nicholls, J. Simon, & M. Gabriel (Eds.), New frontiers in social innovation research. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137506801_6
  • Gago, D., & Rubalcaba, L. (2025). Co-creation for public innovation: The role of living labs and user-engagement methodologies. Public Money & Management, 45(6), 604–614.
  • Gallego, J., Rubalcaba, L., & Gago, D. (2018). Service innovation dynamics towards open and social innovation. Open innovation 2.0 yearbook 2017–2018 (pp. 59–67). Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Hoogstraaten, M. J., Frenken, K., & Boon, W. P. (2020). The study of institutional entrepreneurship and its implications for transition studies. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 36, 114–136.
  • Howaldt, J., & Schwarz, M. (2010). Social innovation : concepts, research fields and international trends, Aachen, International Monotoring (IMO). http://www.transitsocialinnovation.eu/resource-hub/social-innovation--concepts-research-fields-and-international-trends.
  • Howaldt, J., Domanski, D., & Kaletka, C. (2016). Social innovation: towards a new innovation paradigm. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 17(6), 20–44. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-69712016/administracao.v17n6p20-44
  • Howaldt, J., Kaletka, C., Schröder, A., & Zirngiebl, M. (2018). Atlas of social Innovation – New practices for a better future. Dortmund.
  • Kumar, T., & Saizen, I. (2023). Social innovation perspective of Community-Based climate change adaptation: A Framework-Based study of Ladakh. India Water, 15(7), 1424.
  • Martin, B. R., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2025). Richard R Nelson (1930–2025): Evolutionary economist and innovation scholar. Research Policy, 54(4), 105211.
  • Martins, T., Braga, A., Ferreira, M. R., & Braga, V. (2022). Diving into social innovation: A bibliometric analysis. Administrative Sciences, 12(2), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12020056
  • Menter, M. (2024). From technological to social innovation: Toward a mission-reorientation of entrepreneurial universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 49(1), 104–118.
  • Morsy, M., Trott, P., & Cho, D. S. (2024). Corporate social innovation: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Society and Business Review, 19(3), pp523–550. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-06-2023-0176
  • Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E., & Gonzalez, S. (2005). Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1969–1990.
  • Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press.
  • Nelson, R. (2003). : Physical and social technologies, and their evolution, LEM Working Paper Series, No. 2003/09, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Pisa.
  • Nelson, R. R. (2008). What enables rapid economic progress: What are the needed institutions? Research Policy, 37(1), 1–11.
  • Nelson, R. R., & Sampat, B. N. (2001). Making sense of institutions as a factor shaping economic performance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 44(1), 31–54.
  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press.
  • OECD (2000). LEED forum on social innovation. https://www.oecd.org/regional/leed/social-innovation.htm#:~:text=In%202000%2 C%20the%20 OECD%20LEED,set%20of%20socially%20innovative%20initiatives.
  • Olejniczak, J., & Bednarska-Olejniczak, D. (2025). Participatory budget as a social innovation. Handbook on Post-Schumpeterian innovations (pp. 207–224). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Ongaro, E., Orsina, G., & Castellani, L. (Eds.). (2025b). The Humanities and Public Administration. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. Retrieved Jul 1, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035333608
  • Ongaro, E., Rubalcaba, L., & Solano, E. (2025a). The ideational bases of public value co-creation and the philosophy of personalism: Why a relational conception of person matters for solving public problems. Public Policy and Administration, 40(3), 429–451.
  • Ostanel, E. (2023). Innovation in strategic planning: Social innovation and co-production under a common analytical framework. Planning Theory, 24(1), 64–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952231182610
  • Pacheco, J. N., Turro, A., & Urbano, D. (2025). Open social innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 216(C).
  • Pol, E., & Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term? Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(6), 878–885.
  • Rubalcaba, L., & Solano, E. (2023). The pros of social innovation. Debating innovation: Perspectives and paradoxes of an idealized concept (pp. 141–161). Springer International Publishing.
  • Strokosch, K., & Osborne, S. P. (2024). Understanding value creation from a public service logic. In I. Lapsley, & P. Miller (Eds.), The resilience of new public management (pp. 295–313). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198883814.003.0013
  • Tang, L., Li, Z., Liu, H., et al. (2024). Appraising the philosophical influences on modern public administration research. Public Policy and Administration, 40(3), 513–531.
  • Van der Have, R. P., & Rubalcaba, L. (2016). Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies? Research Policy, 45(9), 1923–1935.
  • Ziegler, R. (2017). Social innovation as a collaborative concept. Innovation: the European Journal of Social Science Research, 30(4), 388–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2017.1348935