Kevin Durant has outlined how Michael Jordan could have joined LeBron James in the 40,000-point club, pointing to one key factor that limited his total.
The conversation around all-time scoring has shifted since LeBron crossed the historic mark, bringing renewed focus to how past legends might compare under different circumstances.
Durant's view adds context to that debate, suggesting Jordan's total does not fully reflect his scoring level.
Photo by Jack Gorman/Getty Images
Durant on scoring debate broke down the impact of Jordan's time away from the game when discussing the 40,000-point milestone.
"He could've played past 40, too. I would say MJ took off four to five years combined. You give him 300 more games of 30 points a night. That's not an exaggeration.
"That's what he averaged—30! I don't want to take that away from him when I pass him," Durant said.
Durant's calculation is simple: extend Jordan's career without interruptions, and the numbers shift dramatically.
It reframes the discussion from total points to opportunity, highlighting how career length plays a decisive role in modern record-setting.
Durant also made clear that Jordan's place in history is not defined by where he sits on the scoring list.
"I think that's key for any historian to know that about MJ. It's cool to still be in that same realm as him, but he's more than a 32,000-point scorer to me," KD added.
The point shifts the focus away from numbers and toward impact, reinforcing how Jordan's influence extends beyond statistical comparisons.
For Durant, the 40,000 conversation is relevant, but it does not change how Jordan is viewed within the game.
It instead adds another layer to how different eras and career paths shape the records that define them.
Read more:
