The Knicks have a bench guard conundrum
- Story by
- The Knicks have a bench guard conundrum


When you're the defending champions, there are not many holistic things to complain about.
Sure, the Knicks started 0-3 with a very unsettling offense, but all they needed was their medicine (the Nets and Bulls) to get back to .500?
Worried about losing to Philadelphia twice in October? Joel Embiid's plantar fasciitis has already acted up; calm down.
Any "problems" this early in the season are either short-term, regarding the looming extension talks, or good problems, which are more conundrums than actual problems.
The biggest of those conundrums has to do with the Knicks' rotation, specifically with their copious amounts of guard depth.
Jalen Brunson is the head of the snake, but after him? There are a lot of players with minutes who could fluctuate on any given night.
Tyler Kolek and Jose Alvarado duel over backup ball-handler minutes. Jordan Clarkson and Deuce McBride grapple over bench two-guard minutes. Landry Shamet's strong play is actively pushing starters Mikal Bridges and Josh Hart over their minutes with the three entrenched parts of the team's nucleus.
It does qualify as a good problem to have, as injuries will undoubtedly give each of these guys ample opportunity over the course of 82 games, but when they're all healthy, like they are right now? It probably gives Mike Brown a bigger headache than watching Andre Drummond attempt layups.
All of these guys provide something that the Knicks could use more of, but have warts that can limit their playing time.
Kolek is the best true playmaker, but he's a poor defender, and his jump shot has been consistent throughout his young NBA career. This basically also describes Alvarado, but the defense is better from the New York native.
McBride has stretches where he's the team's best rate shooter and is a tremendously pesky point-of-attack defender… but is that not what the team is getting out of a taller two-guard in Shamet?
Clarkson has been a sparkplug every game he's played this year, but the 35-year-old showed his maddening inconsistency in his first year in New York.
It's created an extremely volatile rotation, which isn't surprising when you have a coach who opened the year saying only five players on this team have minutes that are secured.
Despite zero Knicks players averaging more than 33 minutes a game except Brunson (who's at 34.1), only Shamet is averaging more than 18 minutes a game off the bench.
McBride is at 17.5, Kolek is at 12.2, Alvarado is at 11.3, and Clarkson is at 9.9, but even these are deceiving.
Kolek has played steady rotation minutes, but didn't play at all in the first two games before Alvarado's ankle injury. Alvarado played 16 and 11 minutes, got hurt, got benched after nine minutes on Monday, and was on track to be a DNP-CD against the Bulls on Wednesday.
Clarkson's gone from playing three, five, or eight minutes to his spurts of 15 and 17 in the two games against the Bulls and his 11 to spark the incredible fourth quarter against Brooklyn.
McBride, who's served as the Knicks' sixth man for over two years now, has topped 17 minutes just twice. He played a season-low 11 minutes on Wednesday and hasn't had a clear role.
To get these guys more minutes, it would mean cutting minutes from Hart or Bridges. While both have their warts, and the latter continues to look somehow less involved than he was during his lowest moments last season, some of the Knicks' best lineups are coming with them on the court… just separated.
We've seen Brown deploy line changes significantly more in the early going, opting to sub in three or four players at a time to deploy uniform units, but that's not helping how erratic this all feels.
The depth is making players redundant on the court, especially with how unwise it is to run four-guard lineups in an NBA that's prioritizing size and length more and more.
And with the Knicks' extremely shallow forward and center depth? This glut might have to be sorted out at the trade deadline. As much as McBride has shown his tremendous value to the Knicks over the course of his contract, if he isn't going to play more, is it even a net positive to keep him for the playoff run?
For now, it's merely a conundrum that Coach Brown will be scratching his head over every game.
By the time we hit February? Things better be sorting themselves out.