Arne Slot is leaving Liverpool with immediate effect, and the call will inevitably divide opinion at Anfield.
Liverpool have confirmed the Dutchman's departure after two seasons in charge, with the process to appoint a successor now under way.
Liverpool are entitled to believe they need a new direction after the 2025-26 season. But that does not mean Slot's reign should be treated as a failed experiment.
Photo by Liverpool FC/Liverpool FC via Getty Images
This is a ruthless decision, but it is not impossible to understand.
Liverpool's own statement made clear that the club have collectively decided that change is necessary to keep moving forward.
That wording matters. It shows this is not a knee-jerk reaction to one bad run, or an attempt to erase the past two years.
It is a judgement call on the club's trajectory. If the internal review suggested things had stalled, the decision can be justified.
The timing is still severe. Removing a head coach with Slot's record piles pressure on those responsible for the next appointment.
But that is the price Liverpool have chosen to pay. Once a club makes this kind of call, it has to be right about what comes next.
The biggest mistake now would be to rewrite Slot's time at Liverpool because of the way it ended.
He joined the club in June 2024 and delivered Liverpool's 20th league title in his first season.
That alone secures his place in the club's modern history. Liverpool had waited a long time for that milestone, and Slot delivered it immediately after succeeding Jurgen Klopp.
He was also named LMA Manager of the Year, while Liverpool reached the Carabao Cup final and the last 16 of the Champions League during the same campaign.
Those are not the achievements of a failed appointment. They are the record of a manager who followed an era-defining figure and still made Liverpool champions.
That has to remain the starting point for any fair judgement of his spell.
The more persuasive reading is that Liverpool have acted because of trajectory rather than legacy.
The club said their conclusion was built on a belief that the team's trajectory is best addressed through a change of direction.
That is the central line in the statement. Liverpool did not attack Slot's ability, dismiss his achievements, or frame the last two years as a mistake.
They also noted that he oversaw Champions League qualification for a second successive season and reached the quarter-finals of the competition in 2025-26.
At the same time, The Athletic reported Liverpool finished fifth with 60 points, which gives the club's decision a clear performance backdrop.
That is why both things can be true. Liverpool can be right to demand more, and Slot can still leave as a successful Liverpool manager.
The danger is letting the shock of the decision flatten the full picture. Slot's reign ended abruptly, but it did not end empty.
Liverpool have made a ruthless call because they believe the next phase needs different leadership. The next head coach will inherit not just a squad, but the burden of proving that removing a title-winning manager was worth it.
Slot leaves with a league title, respect from the club's own statement and a legacy that should remain intact. Liverpool may be right to move on, but they should not let the end distort what came before.
Read more:
