Hang on. We'd seen that goal before, hadn't we? We'd seen Martin Odegaard just there, lurking undetected in a pocket of space between defence and midfield. We'd seen Christos Tzolis drive inside and fire that exact pass into the centre. We'd seen Riccardo Calafiori's decoy run and Kai Havertz intelligently leave it. We'd seen Odegaard's little dart, the velcro control, the poise as he waited just a beat before pulling the trigger.
If Odegaard's winning goal against Chelsea felt familiar, that's because he'd scored a carbon copy against Manchester City in the Community Shield three weeks earlier. The same players, the same movements, the same outcome, with a world-class goalkeeper – then Gianluigi Donnarumma, now Emiliano Martinez – left beaten on the ground as the ball hit the net.
The prevailing question at the start of the season was not who would win the league so much as how Arsenal would win it. Will they roll out the 2025/26 blueprint, bludgeoning teams to death by a thousand corners, strangling possession, smothering all routes to xG? Or would we see something altogether more free-flowing and spontaneous now the weight of a 22-year wait had been lifted?
You can already feel a buzz in the air outside the Emirates, a sense that the brittleness of past years has disappeared in the wind. Music blaring from the megastore DJ could be heard down every road leading to Armoury Square three hours before kick-off. Inside, hundreds queued to buy an Arsenal scarf or pyjamas or a cushion with Declan Rice's face on. Outside, content creators jostled for space while fans videoed fellow fans being interviewed by other fans on YouTube.
It is that strange time of the season when the leaves are still green and summer is clinging on. The transfer frenzy has only just ended and, really, we don't know anything yet. The sample sizes are small and in this twilight window, we inevitably draw bad judgments. At exactly the same stage last year, three games in, the champions Liverpool beat the pretenders Arsenal and the title race was surely over.
What sort of Arsenal might we get? The first few games of the season had not served up a definitive answer, but this game felt different . It was no doubt influenced by Chelsea's decision to play basketball, by Morgan Rogers' early goal which forced Arsenal to show urgency, by Martinez, chief s***house of the Premier League , whose presence poked the Emirates into furious noise. Even so, this was a performance full of roving positions, slick interchanges and seamless rotations which felt thrilling at times, and Chelsea struggled to follow them.
Martin Odegaard fires home Arsenal's winning goal against Chelsea (PA)
Martin Odegaard scored the winner as the Gunners maintained their 100% record (Reuters)
There was a moment late in the first half when Havertz was on the right wing, Calafiori was galloping into the right half-space, Odegaard was the striker and Bukayo Saka was inside as the No 10. Only David Raya, Ezri Konsa and Gabriel Magalhaes could claim to have been at their stations. And Odegaard's goal was a product of a higher tempo that this Arsenal side had at times abandoned in the final months of last season, understandably so through tension, through fatigue, perhaps even through sheer fear at what they might lose.
It didn't help that Arsenal played without this version of Odegaard last season, a campaign derailed by injury. He rediscovered his flow captaining Norway at the World Cup and has continued that form with three goals in four Arsenal games, if you like to count the Community Shield as a game. Where he has sometimes fallen into a rhythm of taking the easy option, being Arsenal's playmaker on the fringe of a match, here there was a boldness to his runs, getting closer to Havertz, nearer the goal, demanding the ball in tight spaces where his close control can hurt opponents.
"He's fit, his confidence is one of the highest that I've seen him and he has a point to prove," said Arteta. "Kai the same, Bukayo the same. We missed so many attacking players last season for long, long periods, and I don't know how many times they've played together, those three, in the last few years. Probably not much. You feel the chemistry that they have between them and what they can produce. You have to play with real intent and that's what I loved seeing today. He was running forward, he took shots, he created so many situations for his teammates."
Are Arsenal about to unleash a season of wild, entertaining chaos-ball? Probably not. Arteta is not about to abandon the positional principles that have served his coaching career so well. Arsenal will not play a team as frantic as this Chelsea side every week. But there is a paradox here, that the cohesion and connections in this team are so well honed by now, so sharply refined, that Arsenal can produce pre-planned patterns as mesmerising to watch and difficult to defend as anything off the cuff.
Perhaps this is the next evolution of Arteta's team, to be as meticulously well-drilled in the disorder of open play as they are standing over the certainty of a set-piece. The fact Odegaard scored the same goal twice in a month suggests that, even within the confines of their manager's highly tuned system, Arsenal might be unlocking some new attacking verve.
