競争を促すために有効な規制が必要かもしれませんが、同時に市場競争で得た地位を過度に否定することも慎重であるべきです。Googleの圧倒的なシェアは、企業努力と技術革新の成果でもあるわけで、その点を無視した批判はバランスを欠くでしょう。 English Comment:
It’s no secret that Google holds a monopoly over search engines, and this dominance is evident to anyone. However, there’s a certain disconnect in criticizing Google for what is ultimately the result of consumer choice−users actively prefer Google for its usability and accuracy.
Google's proposed solution, allowing users to change their default search engine every 12 months, seems like a gesture toward fairness. Yet, in practice, this measure is unlikely to significantly alter the landscape. People's habits and trust in Google's brand make it improbable that such a policy would lead to meaningful competition. This proposal might be perceived more as a symbolic move to appease regulators than a practical solution.
While fostering competition is important, it's also crucial not to undermine a position earned through innovation and effort. Google's dominant share is, after all, a product of its success, and blanket criticisms of its monopoly risk overlooking this fact. Striking a balance between regulation and recognition of market success is key.