Stay organized with collectionsSave and categorize content based on your preferences.
This document describes a threat finding type in Security Command Center. Threat findings are generated bythreat detectorswhen they detect
a potential threat in your cloud resources. For a full list of available threat findings, seeThreat findings index.
Overview
A library that was not part of the original container image was loaded.
Attackers might load malicious libraries into existing programs in order to
bypass code execution protections and to hide malicious code. Ensuring that your containers are immutable is an important best practice. This is a low-severity finding, because
your organization might not be following this best practice. There are
correspondingExecution: Added Malicious Library Loadedfindings when the hash
of the binary is a known indicator of compromise (IoC).
How to respond
To respond to this finding, do the following:
Step 1: Review finding details
Open anAdded Library Loadedfinding as directed inReviewing findings. The details panel for the
finding opens to theSummarytab.
On theSummarytab, review the information in the following sections:
What was detected, especially the following fields:
Program binary: the full path of the process binary that loaded the
library.
Libraries: details about the added library.
Arguments: the arguments provided when invoking the process
binary.
Affected resource, especially the following fields:
VirusTotal indicator: link to the VirusTotal analysis page.
Click theJSONtab and note the following fields:
resource:
project_display_name: the name of the project that contains
the asset.
sourceProperties:
Pod_Namespace: the name of the Pod's Kubernetes namespace.
Pod_Name: the name of the GKE Pod.
Container_Name: the name of the affected container.
Container_Image_Uri: the name of the container image being executed.
VM_Instance_Name: the name of the GKE node where the
Pod executed.
Identify other findings that occurred at a similar time for this container. Related findings might indicate that this activity was malicious, instead of a failure to follow best practices.
Step 2: Review cluster and node
In the Google Cloud console, go to theKubernetes clusterspage.
On the Google Cloud console toolbar, select the project listed inresource.project_display_name, if necessary.
Filter on the cluster listed on theResource full namerow in theSummarytab of the finding details and the Pod namespace
listed inPod_Namespace, if necessary.
Select the Pod listed inPod_Name. Note any metadata about the Pod and
its owner.
Check the SHA-256 hash value for the binary flagged as malicious onVirusTotalby clicking the link inVirusTotal indicator. VirusTotal is an Alphabet-owned service that
provides context on potentially malicious files, URLs, domains, and IP
addresses.
To develop a response plan, combine your
investigation results with the MITRE research and VirusTotal analysis.
Step 7: Implement your response
The following response plan might be appropriate for this finding, but might also impact operations.
Carefully evaluate the information you gather in your investigation to determine the best way to
resolve findings.
If the library was intended to be included in the container, rebuild the
container image with the library included. This way, the container can be
immutable.
Otherwise, contact the owner of the project with the compromised container.
[[["Easy to understand","easyToUnderstand","thumb-up"],["Solved my problem","solvedMyProblem","thumb-up"],["Other","otherUp","thumb-up"]],[["Hard to understand","hardToUnderstand","thumb-down"],["Incorrect information or sample code","incorrectInformationOrSampleCode","thumb-down"],["Missing the information/samples I need","missingTheInformationSamplesINeed","thumb-down"],["Other","otherDown","thumb-down"]],["Last updated 2025-09-04 UTC."],[],[],null,["| Premium and Enterprise [service tiers](/security-command-center/docs/service-tiers)\n\nThis document describes a threat finding type in Security Command Center. Threat findings are generated by\n[threat detectors](/security-command-center/docs/concepts-security-sources#threats) when they detect\na potential threat in your cloud resources. For a full list of available threat findings, see [Threat findings index](/security-command-center/docs/threat-findings-index).\n\nOverview\n\nA library that was not part of the original container image was loaded.\nAttackers might load malicious libraries into existing programs in order to\nbypass code execution protections and to hide malicious code. Ensuring that your containers are immutable is an important best practice. This is a low-severity finding, because\nyour organization might not be following this best practice. There are\ncorresponding `Execution: Added Malicious Library Loaded` findings when the hash\nof the binary is a known indicator of compromise (IoC).\n\nHow to respond\n\nTo respond to this finding, do the following:\n\nStep 1: Review finding details\n\n1. Open an `Added Library Loaded` finding as directed in\n [Reviewing findings](/security-command-center/docs/how-to-investigate-threats#reviewing_findings). The details panel for the\n finding opens to the **Summary** tab.\n\n2. On the **Summary** tab, review the information in the following sections:\n\n - **What was detected** , especially the following fields:\n - **Program binary**: the full path of the process binary that loaded the library.\n - **Libraries**: details about the added library.\n - **Arguments**: the arguments provided when invoking the process binary.\n - **Affected resource** , especially the following fields:\n - **Resource full name** : the [full resource name](/apis/design/resource_names) of the cluster.\n - **Related links** , especially the following fields:\n - **VirusTotal indicator**: link to the VirusTotal analysis page.\n3. Click the **JSON** tab and note the following fields:\n\n - `resource`:\n - `project_display_name`: the name of the project that contains the asset.\n - `sourceProperties`:\n - `Pod_Namespace`: the name of the Pod's Kubernetes namespace.\n - `Pod_Name`: the name of the GKE Pod.\n - `Container_Name`: the name of the affected container.\n - `Container_Image_Uri`: the name of the container image being executed.\n - `VM_Instance_Name`: the name of the GKE node where the Pod executed.\n4. Identify other findings that occurred at a similar time for this container. Related findings might indicate that this activity was malicious, instead of a failure to follow best practices.\n\nStep 2: Review cluster and node\n\n1. In the Google Cloud console, go to the **Kubernetes clusters** page.\n\n [Go to Kubernetes clusters](https://console.cloud.google.com/kubernetes/list)\n\n \u003cbr /\u003e\n\n2. On the Google Cloud console toolbar, select the project listed in\n `resource.project_display_name`, if necessary.\n\n3. Select the cluster listed in `resource.name`. Note any metadata about\n the cluster and its owner.\n\n4. Click the **Nodes** tab. Select the node listed in `VM_Instance_Name`.\n\n5. Click the **Details** tab and note the\n `container.googleapis.com/instance_id` annotation.\n\nStep 3: Review Pod\n\n1. In the Google Cloud console, go to the **Kubernetes Workloads** page.\n\n [Go to Kubernetes Workloads](https://console.cloud.google.com/kubernetes/workload)\n\n \u003cbr /\u003e\n\n2. On the Google Cloud console toolbar, select the project listed in\n `resource.project_display_name`, if necessary.\n\n3. Filter on the cluster listed on the **Resource full name** row in the\n **Summary** tab of the finding details and the Pod namespace\n listed in `Pod_Namespace`, if necessary.\n\n4. Select the Pod listed in `Pod_Name`. Note any metadata about the Pod and\n its owner.\n\nStep 4: Check logs\n\n1. In the Google Cloud console, go to **Logs Explorer**.\n\n [Go to Logs Explorer](https://console.cloud.google.com/logs/query)\n2. On the Google Cloud console toolbar, select the project listed in\n `resource.project_display_name`, if necessary.\n\n3. Set **Select time range** to the period of interest.\n\n4. On the page that loads, do the following:\n\n 1. Find Pod logs for `Pod_Name` by using the following filter:\n - `resource.type=\"k8s_container\"`\n - `resource.labels.project_id=\"`\u003cvar class=\"edit\" translate=\"no\"\u003eresource.project_display_name\u003c/var\u003e`\"`\n - `resource.labels.location=\"`\u003cvar class=\"edit\" translate=\"no\"\u003elocation\u003c/var\u003e`\"`\n - `resource.labels.cluster_name=\"`\u003cvar class=\"edit\" translate=\"no\"\u003ecluster_name\u003c/var\u003e`\"`\n - `resource.labels.namespace_name=\"`\u003cvar class=\"edit\" translate=\"no\"\u003ePod_Namespace\u003c/var\u003e`\"`\n - `resource.labels.pod_name=\"`\u003cvar class=\"edit\" translate=\"no\"\u003ePod_Name\u003c/var\u003e`\"`\n 2. Find cluster audit logs by using the following filter:\n - `logName=\"projects/`\u003cvar class=\"edit\" translate=\"no\"\u003eresource.project_display_name\u003c/var\u003e`/logs/cloudaudit.googleapis.com%2Factivity\"`\n - `resource.type=\"k8s_cluster\"`\n - `resource.labels.project_id=\"`\u003cvar class=\"edit\" translate=\"no\"\u003eresource.project_display_name\u003c/var\u003e`\"`\n - `resource.labels.location=\"`\u003cvar class=\"edit\" translate=\"no\"\u003elocation\u003c/var\u003e`\"`\n - `resource.labels.cluster_name=\"`\u003cvar class=\"edit\" translate=\"no\"\u003ecluster_name\u003c/var\u003e`\"`\n - \u003cvar class=\"edit\" translate=\"no\"\u003ePod_Name\u003c/var\u003e\n 3. Find GKE node console logs by using the following filter:\n - `resource.type=\"gce_instance\"`\n - `resource.labels.instance_id=\"`\u003cvar class=\"edit\" translate=\"no\"\u003einstance_id\u003c/var\u003e`\"`\n\nStep 5: Investigate running container\n\nIf the container is still running, it might be possible to investigate the\ncontainer environment directly.\n\n1. Go to the Google Cloud console.\n\n \u003cbr /\u003e\n\n [Open Google Cloud console](https://console.cloud.google.com/)\n\n \u003cbr /\u003e\n\n2. On the Google Cloud console toolbar, select the project listed in\n `resource.project_display_name`, if necessary.\n\n3. Click **Activate Cloud Shell** .\n\n4. Obtain GKE credentials for your cluster by running the\n following commands.\n\n For zonal clusters: \n\n gcloud container clusters get-credentials \u003cvar class=\"edit\" translate=\"no\"\u003ecluster_name\u003c/var\u003e --zone \u003cvar class=\"edit\" translate=\"no\"\u003elocation\u003c/var\u003e --project \u003cvar class=\"edit\" translate=\"no\"\u003eresource.project_display_name\u003c/var\u003e\n\n For regional clusters: \n\n gcloud container clusters get-credentials \u003cvar class=\"edit\" translate=\"no\"\u003ecluster_name\u003c/var\u003e --region \u003cvar class=\"edit\" translate=\"no\"\u003elocation\u003c/var\u003e --project \u003cvar class=\"edit\" translate=\"no\"\u003eresource.project_display_name\u003c/var\u003e\n\n5. Retrieve the added library by running:\n\n kubectl cp \u003cvar class=\"edit\" translate=\"no\"\u003ePod_Namespace\u003c/var\u003e/\u003cvar class=\"edit\" translate=\"no\"\u003ePod_Name\u003c/var\u003e:\u003cvar class=\"edit\" translate=\"no\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"devsite-syntax-w\"\u003e \u003c/span\u003eAdded_Library_Fullpath\u003c/var\u003e -c \u003cvar class=\"edit\" translate=\"no\"\u003eContainer_Name\u003c/var\u003e \u003cvar translate=\"no\"\u003elocal_file\u003c/var\u003e\n\n Replace \u003cvar translate=\"no\"\u003elocal_file\u003c/var\u003e with a local file path to store the added\n library.\n6. Connect to the container environment by running:\n\n kubectl exec --namespace=\u003cvar class=\"edit\" translate=\"no\"\u003ePod_Namespace\u003c/var\u003e -ti \u003cvar class=\"edit\" translate=\"no\"\u003ePod_Name\u003c/var\u003e -c \u003cvar class=\"edit\" translate=\"no\"\u003eContainer_Name\u003c/var\u003e -- /bin/sh\n\n This command requires the container to have a shell installed at `/bin/sh`.\n\nStep 6: Research attack and response methods\n\n1. Review MITRE ATT\\&CK framework entries for this finding type: [Ingress Tool Transfer](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1105/), [Shared Modules](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1129/).\n2. Check the SHA-256 hash value for the binary flagged as malicious on [VirusTotal](https://www.virustotal.com) by clicking the link in **VirusTotal indicator**. VirusTotal is an Alphabet-owned service that provides context on potentially malicious files, URLs, domains, and IP addresses.\n3. To develop a response plan, combine your investigation results with the MITRE research and VirusTotal analysis.\n\nStep 7: Implement your response\n\n\nThe following response plan might be appropriate for this finding, but might also impact operations.\nCarefully evaluate the information you gather in your investigation to determine the best way to\nresolve findings.\n\n- If the library was intended to be included in the container, rebuild the container image with the library included. This way, the container can be immutable.\n- Otherwise, contact the owner of the project with the compromised container.\n- Stop or [delete](/container-registry/docs/managing#deleting_images) the compromised container and replace it with a [new container](/compute/docs/containers).\n\nWhat's next\n\n- Learn [how to work with threat\n findings in Security Command Center](/security-command-center/docs/how-to-investigate-threats).\n- Refer to the [Threat findings index](/security-command-center/docs/threat-findings-index).\n- Learn how to [review a\n finding](/security-command-center/docs/how-to-investigate-threats#reviewing_findings) through the Google Cloud console.\n- Learn about the [services that\n generate threat findings](/security-command-center/docs/concepts-security-sources#threats)."]]