Stay organized with collectionsSave and categorize content based on your preferences.
Tuesday, June 03, 2008
About a year ago, in response to user feedback,we created a paid links reporting formwithin Webmaster Tools. User feedback, through reportingpaid links,webspam, or
suggestions in ourWebmaster Help Group,
has been invaluable in ensuring that the quality of our index and our tools is as high as
possible. Today, I'd like to highlight the impact that reporting paid links and webspam has had
on our index. In a future post, I'll showcase how user feedback and concerns in the Webmaster Help
Group have helped us improve our Help Center documentation and Webmaster Tools.
Reporting Paid Links
As mentioned in the postInformation about buying and selling links that pass PageRank,
Google reserves the right to take action on sites that buy or sell links that pass PageRank for
the purpose of manipulating search engine rankings. Even though we work hard to discount these
links through algorithmic detection, if you see a site that is buying or selling links that pass
PageRank,please let us know.
Over the last year, users have submitted thousands and thousands of paid link reports to Google,
and each report can contain multiple websites that are suspected of selling links. These reports
are actively reviewed, and the feedback is invaluable to improve our search algorithms. We also
are willing to take manual action on a significant fraction of paid link reports as we continue
to improve our algorithms. More importantly, the hard work of users who have already reported
paid links has helped improve the quality of our index for millions. For more information on
reporting paid links, check outthis Help Center article.
Reporting Webspam
Google has also provided a form to report general webspam since November 2001. We appreciate users
who alert us to potential abuses for the sake of the whole Internet community. Spam reports come
in two flavors: anauthenticated formthat requires
registration inWebmaster Tools,
and anunauthenticated form. We receive
hundreds of reports each day. Spam reports to the authenticated form are given more weight and are
individually investigated more often. Spam reports to the unauthenticated form are assessed in
terms of impact, and a large fraction of those are reviewed as well. As Udi Manber, VP of
Engineering and Search Quality mentioned in his recentblog poston our Official Google Blog, in 2007 more than 450 new improvements were made to our search
algorithms. A number of those improvements were related to webspam. It's not an understatement
to say that users who have taken the time to report spam were essential to many of those
algorithmic enhancements.
Going forward
As users' expectations of search increase daily, we know it's important to provide a high quality
index with relevant results. We're always happy to hear stories in our Webmaster Help Group fromusers who have have reported spamwith noticeable results in our Webmaster Help Group. Now that you know how Google uses feedback to
improve our search quality, you may want to tell us about webspam you've seen in our results.
Please use our authenticated form to reportpaid linksorother types of webspam. Thanks again
for taking the time to help us improve.
[[["Easy to understand","easyToUnderstand","thumb-up"],["Solved my problem","solvedMyProblem","thumb-up"],["Other","otherUp","thumb-up"]],[["Missing the information I need","missingTheInformationINeed","thumb-down"],["Too complicated / too many steps","tooComplicatedTooManySteps","thumb-down"],["Out of date","outOfDate","thumb-down"],["Samples / code issue","samplesCodeIssue","thumb-down"],["Other","otherDown","thumb-down"]],[],[[["\u003cp\u003eGoogle encourages users to report paid links and webspam through designated forms to maintain search quality.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eUser reports have significantly contributed to improving Google's search algorithms and index quality.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eGoogle values user feedback and actively investigates reports, prioritizing those submitted through Webmaster Tools.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eGoogle has implemented numerous search algorithm improvements, many driven by user-reported webspam.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eUsers reporting spam have observed positive impacts on search results, highlighting the effectiveness of the reporting system.\u003c/p\u003e\n"]]],["Users provide feedback via a paid links reporting form, webspam reports, and the Webmaster Help Group. Paid link and webspam reports are reviewed to improve search algorithms. Thousands of paid link reports, each potentially containing multiple websites, have been submitted. Webspam reports, both authenticated and unauthenticated, are assessed, with authenticated reports receiving higher weight and more frequent individual investigation. User feedback significantly aids in the development of search algorithms and overall quality improvement.\n"],null,["# The Impact of User Feedback, Part 1\n\nTuesday, June 03, 2008\n| It's been a while since we published this blog post. Some of the information may be outdated (for example, some images may be missing, and some links may not work anymore).\n\n\nAbout a year ago, in response to user feedback,\n[we created a paid links reporting form](/search/blog/2007/06/more-ways-for-you-to-give-us-input)\nwithin Webmaster Tools. User feedback, through reporting\n[paid links](/search/docs/advanced/guidelines/report-spam),\n[webspam](/search/docs/advanced/guidelines/report-spam), or\nsuggestions in our\n[Webmaster Help Group](https://support.google.com/webmasters/community),\nhas been invaluable in ensuring that the quality of our index and our tools is as high as\npossible. Today, I'd like to highlight the impact that reporting paid links and webspam has had\non our index. In a future post, I'll showcase how user feedback and concerns in the Webmaster Help\nGroup have helped us improve our Help Center documentation and Webmaster Tools.\n\nReporting Paid Links\n--------------------\n\n\nAs mentioned in the post\n[Information about buying and selling links that pass PageRank](/search/blog/2007/12/information-about-buying-and-selling),\nGoogle reserves the right to take action on sites that buy or sell links that pass PageRank for\nthe purpose of manipulating search engine rankings. Even though we work hard to discount these\nlinks through algorithmic detection, if you see a site that is buying or selling links that pass\nPageRank, [please let us know](/search/docs/advanced/guidelines/report-spam).\nOver the last year, users have submitted thousands and thousands of paid link reports to Google,\nand each report can contain multiple websites that are suspected of selling links. These reports\nare actively reviewed, and the feedback is invaluable to improve our search algorithms. We also\nare willing to take manual action on a significant fraction of paid link reports as we continue\nto improve our algorithms. More importantly, the hard work of users who have already reported\npaid links has helped improve the quality of our index for millions. For more information on\nreporting paid links, check out\n[this Help Center article](/search/docs/advanced/guidelines/report-spam).\n\nReporting Webspam\n-----------------\n\n\nGoogle has also provided a form to report general webspam since November 2001. We appreciate users\nwho alert us to potential abuses for the sake of the whole Internet community. Spam reports come\nin two flavors: an\n[authenticated form](/search/docs/advanced/guidelines/report-spam) that requires\nregistration in\n[Webmaster Tools](https://search.google.com/search-console),\nand an [unauthenticated form](/search/docs/advanced/guidelines/report-spam). We receive\nhundreds of reports each day. Spam reports to the authenticated form are given more weight and are\nindividually investigated more often. Spam reports to the unauthenticated form are assessed in\nterms of impact, and a large fraction of those are reviewed as well. As Udi Manber, VP of\nEngineering and Search Quality mentioned in his recent\n[blog post](https://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/05/introduction-to-google-search-quality.html)\non our Official Google Blog, in 2007 more than 450 new improvements were made to our search\nalgorithms. A number of those improvements were related to webspam. It's not an understatement\nto say that users who have taken the time to report spam were essential to many of those\nalgorithmic enhancements.\n\nGoing forward\n-------------\n\n\nAs users' expectations of search increase daily, we know it's important to provide a high quality\nindex with relevant results. We're always happy to hear stories in our Webmaster Help Group from\n[users who have have reported spam](https://groups.google.com/group/Google_Webmaster_Help-Indexing/browse_thread/thread/4ba7a489d72e74e8#)\nwith noticeable results in our Webmaster Help Group. Now that you know how Google uses feedback to\nimprove our search quality, you may want to tell us about webspam you've seen in our results.\nPlease use our authenticated form to report\n[paid links](/search/docs/advanced/guidelines/report-spam) or\n[other types of webspam](/search/docs/advanced/guidelines/report-spam). Thanks again\nfor taking the time to help us improve.\n\nWritten by Reid Yokoyama, Search Quality"]]