これは凄いことでは? 正しく適当であることを、間違いだとしてきた。世界史の恥になるだろう: ー ゼロと算術の確立者は、1300年も前に、ゼロ除算 0/0=0 を述べていた。ところが現在に至るも、それは間違いだとされている。 ところが、最近の研究で、実は それは適切、正しいことが分かった。 他方、 アインシュタインの理論から、0/0=1 だと主張して 譲らないものも居る。 おかしな 事件では? By a {\bf natural extension} of the fractions \begin{equation} \frac{b}{a} \end{equation} for any complex numbers $a$ and $b$, we found the simple and beautiful result, for any complex number $b$ \begin{equation} \frac{b}{0}=0, \end{equation} incidentally in \cite{s} by the Tikhonov regularization for the Hadamard product inversions for matrices and we discussed their properties and gave several physical interpretations on the general fractions in \cite{kmsy} for the case of real numbers. The division by zero has a long and mysterious story over the world (see, for example, H. G. Romig \cite{romig} and Google site with the division by zero) with its physical viewpoints since the document of zero in India on AD 628. In particular, note that Brahmagupta (598 - 668 ?) established the four arithmetic operations by introducing $0$ and at the same time he defined as $0/0=0$ in (Brāhmasphuṭasiddhānta). Our world history, however, stated that his definition $0/0=0$ is wrong over 1300 years, but, we will see that his definition is suitable. However, we do not know the meaning and motievation of the definition of $0/0=0$, furthermore, for the important case $1/0$ we do not know any result there. However, Sin-Ei Takahasi (\cite{kmsy}) established a simple and decisive interpretation (1.2) by analyzing the extensions of fractions and by showing the complete characterization for the property (1.2): \bigskip {\bf Proposition 1. }{\it Let F be a function from ${\bf C }\times {\bf C }$ to ${\bf C }$ satisfying $$ F (b, a)F (c, d)= F (bc, ad) $$ for all $$ a, b, c, d \in {\bf C } $$ and $$ F (b, a) = \frac {b}{a }, \quad a, b \in {\bf C }, a \ne 0. $$ Then, we obtain, for any $b \in {\bf C } $ $$ F (b, 0) = 0. $$ } Note that the complete proof of this proposition is simply given by 2 or 3 lines. We {\bf should define $F(b,0)= b/0 =0$}, in general. \medskip We thus should consider, for any complex number $b$, as (1.2); that is, for the mapping \begin{equation} W = \frac{1}{z}, \end{equation} the image of $z=0$ is $W=0$ ({\bf should be defined}). This fact seems to be a curious one in connection with our well-established popular image for the point at infinity on the Riemann sphere. Therefore, the division by zero will give great impact to complex analysis and to our ideas for the space and universe. The division by zero is uniquely and reasonably determined as 1/0=0/0=z/0=0 in the natural extensions of fractions. We have to change our basic ideas for our space and world: Division by Zero z/0 = 0 in Euclidean Spaces Hiroshi Michiwaki, Hiroshi Okumura and Saburou Saitoh International Journal of Mathematics and Computation Vol. 28(2017); Issue 1, 2017), 1-16. http://www.scirp.org/journal/alamt http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/alamt.2016.62007 http://www.ijapm.org/show-63-504-1.html http://www.diogenes.bg/ijam/contents/2014-27-2/9/9.pdf http://okmr.yamatoblog.net/…/announcement%20326-%20the%20di… Announcement 326: The division by zero z/0=0/0=0 - its impact to human beings through education and research