It is said to be a boom to hunt for encounter and date actively for more profitable marriage.
One of the background is they think that it has turned out to be only hard for women to keep on working due to glass ceiling and various difficulties -I heard it on a TV discussion program before. If she chose to become a full-time mother to put children first priority, that would be a choice, since the time with parents is very important for children. On the other hand, I have a feeling that becoming a housewife would mean dependant on her husband. Then, if she chose to become a housewife, would she have no right to complain even if her life would be swayed by husband's economy or lifestyle...? Of course dominant by husband by taking advantage of economy or power is inexcusable, and violence is against the law
! (See also Apr. 10, 2009)
As I was grappling with this composition, I recalled news about the statement of the current Prime Minister at a student rally; people who don't have enough money shouldn't marry
To bring it all down to earth, livelihoods are important for married life, especially if we plan to have children -justfrom this point of view, I wouldn't deny this opinion. But what about the timing and the appropriateness of saying? And who or what caused such recession and job shortage that have made young people hesitate to marry due to anxiety for the future...?