Why UEFA is Threatening to Boycott the World Cup

In response to FIFA seeking private investment to purchase a stake in the organisation, UEFA has threatened to boycott the 2030 World Cup. This is the latest chapter in their controversial feud that has intensified in and around this summer's World Cup.

View More

Video Transcript

This is kind of nuts.

I mean, the feud between UEFA, the governing body of European football, and FIFA, the governing body of world football, has been brewing for some time now.

There has been much back and forth between the two organizations about everything to do with referees, to do with regulations, to do with the organizing of the FIFA World Cup this summer in particular.

And now UEFA is actually considering boycotting the next World Cup, which is played partly in Europe as it turns out.

But why is UEFA going to potentially boycott the next World Cup?

Is it something that feasibly could happen?

And what will be the likely outcome from this situation?

We got everything you need to know about this controversial topic here on thefootballchronicle.com, guys.

Shout out to Haley for penning this article.

Let's go through all the nitty-gritty, all the ins and outs about this feud between UEFA and FIFA.

UEFA is stepping up its opposition to FIFA's proposal to raise $20 billion through the sale of minority equity in a newly created commercial entity, with sources indicating European football's governing body is preparing an emergency meeting of its 55 member associations to discuss possible action, including a boycott of the next World Cup, and all World Cups after that potentially too.

The proposal, unveiled by FIFA President Gianni Infantino, our Lord and Savior himself, would see the governing body seek out investment for the FIFA Forward Enterprise, a new organization that would oversee FIFA's commercial operations and major competitions, including future Men's and Women's World Cups.

FIFA is working alongside financial services company JP Morgan, while potential investors include Thrive Eternal, the investment group founded by Joshua Kushner.

And if that name sounds familiar, it should do.

Joshua Kushner is the younger brother of Jared Kushner, who of course is very close to Donald Trump, the United States President.

Now you're starting to see where the concerns are coming from here, and it's not totally unfounded.

We all know about Trump's influence in the latest World Cup, basically getting Balogun unbanned for their match against Belgium.

I mean, they lost anyway as it turned out.

But the fact that the president did that really does speak volumes.

And then you've also got the war between UEFA and FIFA going on.

I mean, you know, FIFA saying, "Well, there's nothing we can do about that Somali referee.

He's not been allowed into the United States, therefore he cannot referee any matches at this World Cup."

They could have stepped in.

They chose not to.

They chose to step in, though, when it came to Balogun.

It shows them where their real priorities lie.

And then UEFA announced that, "Hey, well, you know what?

If you don't want him, we'll have him.

He might be an African referee, but let's get him to referee the UEFA Super Cup final in a few months."

The announcement prompted an immediate response from UEFA, which argued that football's governing institution should never place ownership of the sport's commercial future into the hands of external investors.

Let me remind you as well that FIFA is a registered charity.

They have to put all of their funds from football that are generated back into football.

They are a non-profit, officially anyway.

I know probably behind the scenes their books are rather interesting to read, I bet.

In a strongly worded statement, UEFA said that football isn't FIFA's to sell, warning that the proposal crossed a line that should concern every national association, league, club, player, supporter, and government involved in the game.

Sources told ESPN that opposition within UEFA is significant, with plans advancing for a virtual meeting before the end of the week.

The purpose of the gathering is expected to be to establish a unified European position and examine possible responses if FIFA proceeds with the proposal.

One option expected to be discussed is the prospect of refusing to participate in FIFA competitions in the future.

UEFA previously used their threat of a World Cup boycott during discussions over staging the tournament every two years in 2021.

Those discussions haven't gone away, by the way.

They want to bring it in.

But officially for now, FIFA has shelved that idea.

But you watch, it'll come back eventually.

It's only a matter of time.

Because of course, then it competes directly with the UEFA championships, the European championships, the Euros, whatever you want to call them.

Then it goes on to the same years as them.

So then what happens?

The Euros gets discontinued?

The Euros has to move?

So they're never gonna go with it.

And our new prime minister here in the UK, Andy Burnham, publicly rejected the proposal, writing on X that football does not belong to investors.

Unfortunately though, Andy, as much as I agree with you in principle there, it's gonna change.

International football, officially at least, does not belong to investors.

However, club football very much does.

The Premier League definitely belongs to investors.

La Liga, the Bundesliga.

I mean, I suppose Germany's a bit different.

They have majority owned by the fans.

But you get the point.

Most leagues, anyway, are owned by investors.

International football, for now at least, has stayed away from that.

Officially at least.

I mean, unofficially you can talk about the influence of people like Trump, people like these certain dictators, like Vladimir Putin, like the head of the Qatari regime in the past.

That's nothing new.

You go back even to the likes of Mussolini.

You go back to the likes of, of course, the Argentine dictator back in the day in the '70s.

There have been some dodgy people involved in football for a long time.

But it seems to have gotten worse under Gianni Sicofantino, who's now in charge of FIFA.

A man who has somehow managed to be more corrupt than Sepp Blatter.

At least Sepp Blatter tried to hide from it.

At least he tried to pretend that everything was open and transparent and fair.

It wasn't.

It was nowhere near any of those things.

But at least he tried to keep up appearances.

Infantino, though, doesn't care.

He's the most openly corrupt leader out there, and there's some serious competition for that.

All right, maybe Kim Jong Un is more corrupt, but you know, there's levels to this game, and he's definitely near the top of it, I would say.

FIFA maintains, though, the initiative is designed to strengthen the global game.

And their wallets.

Infantino described the project as an opportunity to unlock football's commercial potential while increasing investment in member associations around the world.

According to FIFA, the FIFA Forward Enterprise could raise up to $4.2 billion later this year through the sale of a minority non-controlling interest based on an overall valuation of $20 billion.

I mean, they can say it's a non-controlling interest, but Trump officially has no financial interest in FIFA and clearly has control over them, clearly has power over them.

So I wouldn't really believe that, to be honest.

Officially, they might not have a controlling state, but they're still at the table.

They're still more vociferous than they would be normally.

The governing body said that member associations would have the option to participate in the expanded financial program, of course, developing funding currently scheduled at $8 million per association during the 27 to 30 cycle.

And that would increase to $20 million before rising further in subsequent cycles because money.

FIFA also stressed that it would retain complete authority over football governance, like during this World Cup where Donald Trump got a guy on band.

Clearly, they had complete authority over that decision, which they did, but they were very much influenced by him.

You see where the problems are arising now, why the people are so concerned.

Competition organization, the international calendar and all sporting regulations, regardless of outside investment.

Press X to doubt.

The proposal arrives after FIFA generated record World Cup revenue of approximately $12 billion from the expanded 2026 tournament across the United States, Canada and Mexico.

Questions have already been raised, though, over whether a similar commercial return can be achieved when Spain, Portugal and Morocco co-host in 2030.

Probably won't, probably won't.

The market's not quite as big over there, but it'll still be very lucrative.

It'll still be more than what Qatar was in 2022, I bet, just because there's more teams and more matches.

And three continents hosting it.

Yes, South America getting involved as well with three token games at the start of the tournament.

Laughable.

The relationship between Infantino and US President Donald Trump has also attracted increased attention following the World Cup this year, with some European officials expressing concern over the political backdrop surrounding FIFA's commercial strategy.

Just look at the statement that Belgium put out in the wake of the Balogun news.

I think they're absolutely spot on, to be honest.

No formal vote has yet been scheduled on the proposal.

FIFA's next online congress is planned for the 23rd of November, when member associations are expected to confirm the host for 2031 and for the 2035 Women's World Cups.

Any discussions regarding the future structure of the FIFA Forward Enterprise is expected to continue in the months ahead, as resistance from European nations gather momentum.

So yeah, FIFA selling part of their soul, part of their interest, part of their sport to the highest bidder.

I suppose it was only a matter of time, wasn't it?

I mean, the Board of Peace at this rate are going to host the next World Cup.

I mean, it's absolutely ridiculous.

But here we go, guys.

This is what football has become.

This is what it will continue to be.

It'll slide further and further into the oblivion, as it were.

As long as they keep making money, as long as we keep lining their pockets by watching games.

And what are you going to do?

Not watch football?

Some people I know have stopped watching football over this kind of maniacal thing that's been going on in recent times under Infantino.

But it's my job.

So here I am.

I'm covering it.

I'm talking about it with you guys.

But do I think it's right what's going on?

Absolutely not.

No, international football should be sacred.

It should not be sold off as a private enterprise.

I mean, imagine if the Olympics did this.

I mean, other sports are different.

Formula One, for example, they've got outside investment.

They've been owned by an investment group called Liberty Media for nearly 10 years now.

Does it make it right that it is?

Well, no.

But you also understand why it is as well.

Football, though, is different.

It's the people's game, or it should be anyway.

It's the working man and woman's game.

It used to be, but it isn't anymore.

Now it's being sold off to the highest bidder.

And yes, the club game went that way a long time ago.

But the international front, that has always been different.

That has purely been about the best teams winning the best tournaments, not the team that spends the most money.

Although we can talk about how the different finances when it comes to these kinds of organizations and everything does affect all of that.

But officially, anyway, when it comes to the investment of FIFA, it's just meant to be a charity.

Now, though, it's going to become a for-profit company.

Officially.

I mean, unofficially, it's been that for a while, but officially it will be.

So let me know your thoughts about all this in the comments below, guys.

The war between UEFA and FIFA intensifies.

But you know what?

I'm definitely on UEFA's side here.

Will they boycott the next World Cup?

Almost certainly not.

Almost certainly not.

I do call them on that bluff, I'll be honest.

But the fact that they are threatening to do that does tell you a lot.

See you soon, guys.

Have a good one.

Close