Best hiking shoes in 2026: We tested 25 pairs from casual trails to rocky scrambles
Yahoo's team of hiking enthusiasts tested shoes from brands like Merrell, La Sportiva, Salomon and Oboz to find the best picks for everything from trail running to rugged backpacking.
Our experts independently review everything we recommend. If you buy through our links, we may earn commission.
Hiking is arguably one of the best forms of exercise out there — and finding the best hiking shoes is the first step to doing it right. Not only is it free, but it offers a remarkable range of health benefits , from improved heart health to lower blood pressure. It's also been shown to reduce stress, anxiety and negative rumination more effectively than indoor activity. In fact, just one hour in nature can make a meaningful difference in your stress levels. But none of that matters if your feet are wrecked by mile two.
In this story
The wrong pair of shoes leads to blisters, sore joints and a hike that ends way sooner than you planned. "Footwear choice is one of the great debates in the outdoors, and there is no single right answer," says Laurel Todesca , product director at self-guided hiking travel company Macs Adventure. "It really comes down to personal preference and other considerations like the terrain and conditions."
The science backs this up: Well-cushioned shoes decrease your chances of getting injured on the trail, while stiffer boots can add ankle support but may stress your knees and reduce walking efficiency. Ultimately, the best hiking shoe or boot is simply the one that matches how and where you move. "Modern hiking boots are far more comfortable and versatile than many people expect," says Brittany Beasley-Davis , director of merchandising at outdoor retailer Christy Sports . "Today's boots are designed with lighter materials, improved cushioning, and shaping that better reflects how people move on the trail."
As a certified personal trainer and strength coach who hikes as often as I can, I worked with a team of eight testers to put 25 pairs through real-world conditions over several months — from gentle dirt paths to steep, rocky scrambles in wet and dry weather. We consulted a podiatric surgeon, a certified walking specialist and outdoor industry experts, then scored each shoe across fit, comfort, traction, stability, protection and value. These 16 earned their mileage.
Best overall hiking shoe
Weight:4.1 oz. men's, 12.34 oz. women's| Waterproofing:Gore-Tex| Upper:Mesh/synthetic | Midsole:FloatPro foam + FlexPlate | Outsole:Vibram TC5+
The Merrell Moab Speed 2 Mid Gore-Tex is the kind of boot that wins over skeptics. Yahoo Editorial Manager Janelle Randazza , a self-described Altra fan, went in expecting to be unimpressed and came away calling these "a very solid second place" behind her all-time favorite. That kind of praise from someone with decades of hiking experience says a lot.
While the Altras narrowly edged out the Moabs for Randazza, and might well score higher among hard-core hikers, the Speed 2 is a better overall option for general hikers. The Altra Lone Peak Hiker 3 is exceptional, but it's a niche pick — best suited for technical hikers who want maximum ground feel and flexibility. The Moab Speed 2 casts a wider net: scoring 4.9 out of 5 in our weighted evaluation, it earned top marks for fit, comfort, traction and overall satisfaction, and the Gore-Tex waterproofing gives it a meaningful edge in varied conditions that the Altra simply can't match.
The cushioning is plush without feeling tippy, and the structure provides real support while staying surprisingly light for a mid-cut. Traction was excellent across pavement, dirt, rock and brambly trails. "If you prefer a moderately stiff boot that still has some flexibility, these are the holy grail," Randazza said.
Dr. Mike Daniels , a board-certified podiatric surgeon with more than 25 years of experience, also recommends the Merrell Moab Speed 2 line, saying it "blends a lighter, more athletic feel with the structure of a mid-cut boot" and is a strong option for anyone who wants ankle support. The Gore-Tex membrane kept feet dry without trapping heat. Plus, it's available in a low-top version if you prefer a more athletic, lightweight feel. For a waterproof, well-structured boot that handles a wide range of conditions, this is our pick.
- Lightweight for a mid-cut boot with excellent structure
- Waterproof, yet surprisingly breathable
- Available in medium and wide widths
- Grippy Vibram TC5+ outsole handles mixed terrain
- Quick break-in period
- Some reviews suggest durability concerns over time
- Runs slightly wider than other mid-cut boots
More hiking shoes we like in 2026
Weight:13.26 oz. men's, 10.5 oz. women's | Waterproofing: ePE Gore-Tex Extended Comfort | Upper: High-tenacity mesh with stretch knit collar | Midsole: Compression-molded EVA | Outsole: FriXion XT 2.0, 4.5 mm lugs
Yahoo Senior Wellness Writer Kelli McGrane took a gamble and wore a pair of brand-new La Sportiva Prodigio Hike GTXes on the Inca Trail in Peru, hiking across wet rock, steep inclines and variable terrain — and it paid off. "I was the only one in the group who wasn't slipping all over the place. In fact, I think I only felt like I was going to slip once during the full trek," she said. She finished each day feeling good too: "Usually, after a day of hiking, I can't wait to get my shoes off and slip into some recovery slides , but my feet were actually feeling great at the end of the day."
The standout feature is the mesh collar, which McGrane — a self-described lower-cut-shoe devotee — appreciated for delivering ankle support without the rub risk of a full boot cuff. "I typically opt for lower trail running-style shoes as I find higher tops tend to rub, but, thanks to the mesh collar, I had more ankle support without the risk of rubbing," she said.
Traction scored a perfect 5 out of 5, the highest of any shoe we tested, and the Gore-Tex held up through serious rainfall in both the Andes and the Amazon with no leaking. These are responsive, nimble shoes with a rocker geometry that propels you forward. The biggest downside? La Sportiva is notorious for running slightly narrow. McGrane describes her foot as neutral width with a high instep and found the fit true to size — but if you prefer a wider toe box, we recommend trying these on in-store before making the investment.
If you're a day hiker who covers several miles on varying terrain and wants to feel connected to the ground, you'll be happy with these.
- Outstanding traction on wet and dry conditions
- Mesh collar provides ankle support that isn't overly stiff or prone to rubbing
- Waterproof and breathable, even in hot and humid conditions
- No break-in period
- Toe box may be too narrow for truly wide feet
- Minimal cushioning — you'll feel rocks and roots underfoot, which some hikers prefer and others don't
Weight:13 oz.men's, 11 oz. women's | Waterproofing:Gore-Tex | Upper:Matryx synthetic/textile | Midsole:EnergyCell EVA + advancedCHASSIS| Outsole:Contagrip rubber
Our tester Andrew Burnie, who has wide feet and is tough to please on fit, called the Salomon X Ultra 5 Gore-Tex "probably the best hiking shoes I've ever worn" — a strong endorsement from someone who actually docked points for the narrow width. That tracks with what experts say: Beasley-Davis specifically recommends the Salomon X Ultra line for its durability and lateral support.
On the trail, grip was flawless on a short but steep, damp descent with loose rock, and the protective toe cap held up against stubs and roots. One standout feature our tester loved: the elasticated tie system with a small pocket on the tongue to stow the excess cord — clever and practical. While we'll have to log a bunch more miles before we can speak confidently to long-term durability, our tester noted the shoe feels solid, with no obvious weak points in construction.
If you have regular-width feet and want a do-it-all waterproof day hiker that feels solid and well-designed, these are an easy recommendation.
- Excellent grip on steep, damp and rocky terrain
- Secure heel lockdown with no slipping
- Elasticated ties with tongue pocket for a clean fit
- Gore-Tex waterproofing with effective toe cap protection
- Feels durable with no obvious weak points
- No wide-width option
- May feel snug across the balls of wider feet
- Limited testing data for performance on more demanding, technical terrain
Weight:12.3 oz. men's, 10.2 oz. women's | Waterproofing:No| Upper:Leather, mesh and webbing| Midsole:TechLite| Outsole:Omni-Grip non-marking rubber
If you want a reliable hiking shoe that won't break the bank, the Crestwood is a safe choice. Yahoo Content Operations Manager Amanda Rickert wore these twice a week for a month across a range of terrain, from gentle slopes to narrow, steep trails with loose rock. Their grip was the highlight, scoring a perfect 5 out of 5 on dry and wet terrain.
To put it to the test, Rickert went beyond her normal trails: "I did my normal nature walks and trail hikes and then put the shoes through some other tests of balancing on tree roots, quick pivots and sudden stops on a variety of terrains and elevations — and these shoes were great," she said. At $80, they're hard to argue with.
However: The trade-off is comfort. The break-in period is rough — Rickert recommended preemptive Band-Aids on your heels for the first couple of outings — and the insole fatigue is real. "Even after I felt like the shoes had been broken in, this was still noticeable to me," she said. If you value comfort above all else, this isn't your ideal hiking shoe.
But if you're willing to swap in a better insole and push through the break-in, you get a well-built shoe with outstanding traction at a price that undercuts most of the competition. Just keep in mind that these aren't waterproof, so save them for dry-weather hikes.
- Excellent traction with Columbia's Omni-Grip outsole
- Well-constructed with good durability
- Good overall value
- Significant break-in period
- Not waterproof
- Insole could benefit from an upgrade
Weight:9.7 oz. men's, 8.3 oz. women's | Waterproofing:No | Upper:Lightweight mesh | Midsole:Balanced/responsive cushioning | Outsole:Vibram Megagrip
Yahoo Senior Deals Writer Christopher McGraw logged more than a dozen outings in the Speedgoat 7 , including trail runs up to 11 miles and shorter family hikes in the Colorado foothills. He called this a "meaningful bounce-back" after a disappointing experience with the Speedgoat 6 — and if that tracks with your experience, these are worth your attention.
The underfoot cushion is exceptional, offering solid protection from trail debris without a rock plate, and the Vibram Megagrip outsole transitions from pavement to trail more smoothly than most aggressive trail shoes can manage. McGraw even accidentally wore them through a paved half-marathon — "not something I'd recommend since the lugs paid the price," he noted — but said he preferred them, comfort-wise, to some of Hoka's dedicated road shoes.
The main drawbacks are the toe box, which feels noticeably tighter than the Speedgoat 5's, and a tongue that could use more padding. On durability, McGraw is refreshingly blunt: "You're not buying these to last forever. You're buying them because nothing else feels like this on a long day out." Don't expect 500-plus miles from these — that's the trade-off for maximalist cushioning. If comfort on long trail days matters more than longevity, the Speedgoat 7 is the trail runner to get.
- Deep cushioning is ideal for long days on trail
- Vibram Megagrip handles everything from singletrack to pavement
- Great color options that work off-trail too
- Available in regular and wide widths
- Toe box somewhat tight
- Foam midsole wears down faster than on traditional trail shoes
- Tongue lacks padding
Weight:13.7 oz. men's, 12 oz. women's| Waterproofing:No | Upper:Polyester mesh, air-mesh collar| Midsole:Altra EGO| Outsole:MaxTrac
The highest-scoring shoe in our entire test, earning a perfect 5 out of 5. Randazza, a seasoned hiker with decades of experience, stopped hiking for years because of ankle instability — she couldn't find a boot that was supportive enough to prevent sprains while still letting her feel the ground. The Lone Peak Hiker line solved that problem — and the third is the best yet.
"These give excellent support and are just cushioned enough to allow me to go for miles, without overdoing it," she said. "They are the most lightweight, breathable, flexible and grippy hiking shoes I've ever tried."
Altra's signature wide, foot-shaped toe box is what earns the Lone Peak Hiker 3 our best wide feet pick. Your toes can splay naturally, and the zero-drop platform promotes a more natural stride. Randazza noted they gripped gravel scrambles securely and could even wedge into rock cracks for lower-grade climbing. If you already own the LPH 2, the upgrade is worth it: "I initially said I'd talk about my Altras but wouldn't test another boot because none could be better. I was wrong," she said. The lacing system, in particular, is a significant improvement over the previous version.
Her verdict: "They are, without any reservation, the best boot I've ever worn. I will only replace these if the [fourth generation] is a marked improvement." If you have wide feet, pronation concerns or prefer feeling the ground — and don't need waterproofing — it's hard to argue with that.
- Foot-shaped toe box allows full natural splay
- No break-in required
- Lightweight, breathable and exceptionally grippy
- Not waterproof
- Zero-drop platform requires adjustment if you're used to a heel-to-toe drop
Weight:11.8 oz. men's, 10.3 oz. women's | Waterproofing:Gore-Tex Invisible Fit | Upper:Mesh | Midsole:Cushioned (proprietary) | Outsole:Trail Tread HD rubber
Yahoo Senior Technology Writer Rick Broida has always been a boot guy, so the Katabatic LT GTX was his first hiking shoe — and he was pleasantly surprised. "I really liked the lighter weight and more shoe-like fit, while still getting boot-like grip and stability," he said. The fit was spot-on straight from the box, the shoe felt lighter than expected given the chunky-looking sole, and after a two-hour trail hike, his feet were "tired but not sore." Arch support scored a perfect 5.
At under 12 ounces per shoe with full Gore-Tex waterproofing, the Katabatic hits a sweet spot if you want weather protection without the weight penalty. It felt equally capable on flat pavement and rockier trails. Broida called the $190 price "reasonable given the quality" — though it's worth noting his testing was limited to three hikes, so long-term durability remains to be proven. If you're transitioning from boots to shoes or want a lightweight waterproof option for mixed terrain day hikes, this one is hard to fault.
- Impressively lightweight for a waterproof shoe
- Snug, secure fit right out of the box
- Equally at home on pavement and rugged trails
- Slightly stiff during the first few miles
- Limited testing time makes durability hard to confirm
Weight:20 oz.men's, 16.8 oz. women's | Waterproofing:Gore-Tex Invisible Fit | Upper:Synthetic with rubber toe cap | Midsole:Dual-density sugarcane-based | Outsole:Vibram Megagrip
The Kaha 3 Mid GTX is a waterproof boot that still feels like a Hoka . "They reminded me of Hoka sneakers with their thick soles and light weight," said Yahoo Lead Home & Garden Editor Jessica Dodell-Feder . "There was hardly any break-in period, and I found them easy to wear on long hikes." She was also impressed by how the thick sole didn't dull her connection to the trail: "I thought this would impede my ability to carefully navigate a pebbly trail with lots of tree roots, but I could still get a good sense for what was underfoot."
As to their waterproofing, Dodell-Feder noted that water beaded and rolled off the upper, and mud either slid off or dried and flaked away. The trade-off on warm days was sweaty feet, but for wet-weather hiking, these delivered. Daniels recommends the Kaha 3 for hikers who want maximal cushioning, especially those with forefoot pain from conditions like metatarsalgia or joint sensitivity. Todesca calls these her "go-to choice for years," praising the balance of support and nimbleness they bring to the table.
The main caveat is fit. Dodell-Feder is between a 7.5 and 8 and shen she tested the 8 "my feet repeatedly slipped forward so my big toe bumped into the front of the shoe," she said. So, size carefully, and if you're between sizes, go with the larger option and wear thicker socks.
- Impressive waterproofing
- Cushioned, bouncy feel similar to Hoka road sneakers
- Strong traction on varied terrain
- Somewhat pricey
- On the heavy side at 20 oz. (men's)
- Tongue fabric makes laces difficult to cinch tight, which can cause foot sliding on descents
Weight:12 oz. men's, 9 oz. women's| Waterproofing:No| Upper:Suede and textile | Midsole:PlyoGo EVA + Trailguard TPU shank | Outsole:Vibram 460 with Megagrip
Rickert wore the Trail 2650s three to four times a week for a month, on everything from city sidewalks to steep rocky trails, and, well, her assessment was blunt: "These shoes are shockingly comfortable. They almost feel like sneakers, which is very impressive for a hiking shoe." She wore them for hours at a time with zero complaints and transitioned easily between urban walking and trail hiking without changing shoes.
The Vibram 460 outsole provides solid grip, though Rickert noted it wasn't the absolute grippiest she's tried. Construction quality stood out too — "there is obviously quality craftsmanship in these shoes," she said, and added she'd recommend them to friends. The main limitation is the lack of waterproofing, but it was no deal-breaker for Rickert: "All the tradeoffs that make the shoes breathable and fashionable feel like the right ones and don't compromise the function of the shoes."
If you hike mostly in dry conditions and want one shoe that handles the trail and looks good at brunch afterward, the Trail 2650s are an easy call.
- Sneaker-like comfort, almost no break-in
- Stylish enough for city wear
- Versatile enough for pavement, dirt and rocky trails
- Feels well-made with no obvious weak points
- Not waterproof
- Grip is not great for technical terrain
Weight:13.7 oz. men's, 11.2 oz. women's | Waterproofing:ePE Gore-Tex Invisible Fit | Upper:Recycled AirMesh. KPU 3D Grid| Midsole:LaSpEVA + injection-molded MEMlex EVA | Outsole:FriXion XT 2.0, 5.5 mm lugs
Dodell-Feder normally wears hiking boots and was surprised at how much more confident she felt in this low-cut option on steep, rocky terrain. She tested the Akyra II GTX on a damp, rainy day on very uneven ground and found the soles noticeably grippy. "I was easily able to pick my way across rocks, giving me a level of security I don't typically feel," she said. The only time she slipped was on wet mossy rocks in a creek, which is a tall order for any shoe.
The aggressive 5.5 mm lugs and flexible sole make these ideal for scrambling and rocky descents. Gore-Tex kept her feet dry even when she stepped in water intentionally. The downside is breathability, as despite the fabric feeling thin and airy, her feet felt sweaty. If your regular hikes involve exposed rock, root-covered descents and variable conditions, the Akyra II is built exactly for that.
- Grippy, agile outsole with 5.5 mm lugs for rocky terrain
- No break-in period
- Waterproof with no leaking through thin-feeling fabric
- Runs warm; moisture-wicking socks recommended
- Best suited for technical terrain; more shoe than necessary for groomed trails
Weight:15.2 oz. men's, 13.8 oz. women's | Waterproofing:DryVent | Upper:Abrasion-resistant ripstop, TPU reinforcements | Midsole:DREAM foam | Outsole:Surface CTRL SC2 rubber, 5 mm lugs
I tested Fastpack Mid Waterproof Boot on a long hike with lots of varying terrain, including steep and very rooty trails and scrambling sections, while rucking with a loaded pack. The comfort was the headline — zero break-in, plenty of cushioning and traction that genuinely surprised me. I was even able to keep perfect traction on steep trails covered in slippery pine needles and mud, which is not something I expected from a boot this cushioned. The 31 mm heel stack absorbs impact well, and the DryVent membrane kept my feet dry without getting sweaty, even with thicker socks on a hot day.
The trade-off is precision. That substantial sole prevents you from feeling the ground as well, as you might like, and the similarly solid heel reduces nimbleness on technical rock. I wanted them off after the hike mainly because they are clunky and warm, but my feet weren't too fatigued despite a lot of challenging terrain.
One longer-term consideration: Highly cushioned foam boots compress faster than other types, which will affect durability over time. If you need to pick your way carefully through a boulder field, these aren't ideal. They are, however, excellent for fastpacking, long-distance day hikes and mixed terrain where you want your feet to feel fresh at the end of the day. Research shows optimal cushioning depends on body weight and load , so if you're carrying a pack, the extra foam can work in your favor.
- Extremely comfortable, no break-in period
- Strong traction on slippery pine needles and mud
- Waterproof
- Less ground feel and precision on technical rock
- Runs warm
- Foam may compress faster than firmer builds
Weight:10 oz. men's, 8 oz. women's| Waterproofing:No| Upper:Matryx synthetic/textile| Midsole:Moderate cushioning, ActiveChassis| Outsole:High-grip rubber, 4.5 mm lugs
Unless stream crossings are a rgular part of your trekking regimen, or if you tend to hiking amid high temps, a non-waterproof hiking shoe is the way to go. In fact, you don't really want a truly waterproof trail runner or hiking shoe at all, because then there is nowhere for water to escape if it does splash into the shoe — and it also means the shoe won't be breathable. The Genesis was one of the most breathable options we tried, and when my feet did get wet, it dried out quickly rather than holding onto moisture.
Beyond breathability, the fit was one of the strongest features — no blisters, hot spots or slipping, right out of the box. I was also impressed by how well the shoe balanced ground feel with comfort. These aren't the maximally cushioned, cloud-thick shoes that are popular right now — and that's a good thing. I was able to feel the ground and how it changed under my feet, which is key for staying safe and avoiding a turned ankle on trail runs.
Grip was excellent on dry terrain, though slightly less reliable in wet conditions. The pull-cord lacing system means laces can never come untied, which is a genuine trail benefit — the only minor gripe is having to tuck the excess cord into the small tongue pocket.
Overall, at under $200, these are a high-value pick for summer hikers, fastpackers and anyone in a warmer clime who wants a natural, connected stride without cooking their feet.
- Comfortable immediately, no break-in needed
- Breathable and fast-draining for warm-weather use
- Excellent grip on dry terrain with good ground feel
- Pull-cord lacing requires stowing excess cord in a small tongue pocket
- Not suited for cold weather, wet conditions or heavily loaded packs
Weight:15.9 oz. men's, 12.7 oz. women's| Waterproofing:Yes| Upper:LWG Gold sued, recycled webbing | Midsole:Cushioned with O Fit support | Outsole:Trail Tread AT rubber
Yahoo Commerce Editor Saundra Latham described the Oboz Hyalite as "a good middle-of-the-road option for more casual hikers who may not want to swap their shoes between tackling a muddy trail and running into town for coffee or groceries." She wore them on pavement, dirt, grass and gravel with no issues and noted zero break-in time.
The waterproofing is a standout feature. "These kept my feet totally dry during long walks in wet grass, and I could see the water beading on top of them," Latham said. At $165, they're a bit of a splurge, but the suede and recycled materials feel tough and built to last. One caveat for summer use: Latham noted they might run a little hot on very warm days, so if you're hiking in high heat, a more breathable option may serve you better.
The main downside is weight. "These did feel a little heavier and clunkier than I expected for a low-cut hiker," she said, which means they're not the right call for a grueling technical hike. But if you need one reliable shoe that can go from a muddy trail straight to running errands without missing a beat, the Hyalite is a winner.
- Zero break-in; comfortable from the first wear
- Excellent waterproofing with visible water beading
- Versatile enough to go from muddy trails to running errands without changing shoes
- Heavier and clunkier than expected for a low-cut shoe
- May run warm on hot days
- Not ideal for technical or rugged terrain
Weight:18.6 oz. (unisex) | Waterproofing:No | Upper:Premium suede or Challenge Leather | Midsole:EVA, custom compression insert | Outsole:Triple-compound rubber
Burnie put the GORUCK MACV-2 High Tops through a multi-terrain hike covering gravel, wooded trails, elevation changes, rocks, tree roots and a marshy section. His verdict: "These boots stood up to everything." The high-cut suede ankle cuff is flexible instead of rigid, which Burnie specifically appreciated. "I actually prefer how these boots move with your ankles instead of resisting them," he said — though he notes the flexible cuff means you'll want to tie them snugly for maximum heel lockdown. Traction scored a perfect 5 on both dry and wet terrain, and the toe caps protect from bumps and stubs.
The high coverage and rugged materials make these ideal for backpacking or rucking. The drain-hole design means water gets pushed out as you walk instead of pooling inside, which GORUCK considers superior to traditional waterproofing. The "Coyote" suede finish looks sharp too, which is rare for a boot built this tough.
Just be aware that the break-in period is real — but it's worth pushing through. Once broken in, the combination of stability, grip and construction quality makes these a strong pick for loaded trail days. At only $5 more than the mid-cut version, the extra ankle coverage is an easy upgrade.
- Full ankle coverage for loaded hiking and rough terrain
- Excellent grip and stability across all conditions
- Premium materials; feels built-to-last
- Rough break-in period
- Limited retail availability outside the brand's website
Weight:9.9 oz. men's, 7.5 oz. women's | Waterproofing:No| Upper:Breathable recycled mesh | Midsole:None (removable Ortholite Performance insole)| Outsole:Firm Ground sticky rubber, 3 mm base, 2.5 mm lugs
If you're already a minimalist shoe enthusiast, the Primus Trail FG 3.5 is a strong option with a loyal following. The ground feel is the point — you can sense the terrain shifting underfoot, which is key for foot placement and stability on trails. Despite the thin sole, I didn't experience pain from rocks or roots, and it's worth noting that being able to feel what's underfoot is actually safer than not, helping you react to changes in terrain more quickly. The sticky rubber outsole gripped dry terrain well.
The main caveat is sizing. These ran about half a size to a full size long for me, which made running difficult — cranking the pull cord tight enough to keep the shoe in place cut into the tops of my feet. That's a significant issue for an online-only shoe. Worth noting, though: plenty of other reviewers rave about these, and the size discrepancy didn't seem to come up in their experiences, which suggests it may not be universal. If you can nail the sizing, the shoe is lightweight and well-made, with no obvious signs of weakness to suggest poor durability.
Just know that minimalist shoes like these are best for hikers with strong feet and calves who carry light loads on relatively forgiving trails. If that sounds like you, these are worth trying.
- Outstanding ground feel without painful impact
- Ultra-lightweight and well-constructed
- Loyal following with strong reviews from minimalist shoe fans
- Sizing may run long by half a size or more
- Can be hard to find in-store, which makes sizing risk harder to manage
- Not suitable for heavy loads, cold weather or technical rocky terrain
Weight:13.5 oz. men's, women's | Waterproofing:No| Upper:230 g/sqm polyester knit, TPU film | Midsole:Lightweight EVA, dual-density insert| Outsole:Triple-compound rubber
I tested the Mackall on steep, rocky terrain with scrambling sections in both dry and wet conditions. The grip was outstanding — excellent for scrambling up loose rock, dirt, mud, you name it. Very stable, but still flexible. These shoes are made for people who load up a pack and go, and the triple-compound rubber outsole feels built to last. I own a different but similar pair of Gorucks, and they're super durable and put up with a lot of abuse — these feel like they'll hold up just as well.
No spacer mesh means the shoe won't hold on to water if you splash through a creek, and it dries quickly. At $160, the value is excellent, and the versatility extends well beyond the trail — these work just as well at the gym or on a job site. The break-in period is real but short, and once you push through it, the combination of flexibility, stability and protection is hard to beat.
- Exceptional grip on loose rock, dirt and mud
- Flexible yet protective; stable without feeling rigid
- Built from high-quality materials designed for heavy use
- Required break-in period; prone to hot spots
- Not waterproof (though designed to drain quickly)
- Limited retail availability outside the brand's website
Types of hiking shoes
Hiking footwear falls into a few key categories, and knowing the differences can help you find the right match for your terrain, distance and comfort preferences.
-
Hiking boots (mid to high cut):Provide ankle support and protection for rough terrain and loaded hiking. Research shows stiffer shafts reduce ankle motion but can increase knee loading and reduce efficiency. Best for backpacking, rocky terrain and colder or wetter conditions.
-
Hiking shoes (low cut):Lighter and more agile than boots, with less ankle coverage. Good for day hikes on moderate terrain where you want speed and flexibility. Most styles offer solid traction and protection without the weight.
-
Trail runners:Designed for speed on trails. Lighter, more flexible and often more breathable than hiking shoes. They sacrifice some protection and durability for a faster, more natural stride. Great for fast hiking, warmer weather and smoother trails.
-
Approach shoes:A hybrid between hiking shoes and climbing shoes; built for rocky scrambles and technical approaches. They tend to have stickier rubber and lower profiles for precision. Best for hikers who encounter exposed rock.
-
Minimalist/barefoot:Thin soles with little to no cushioning or drop. Designed for experienced users with strong feet who want maximum ground feel. Not recommended for heavy loads or very rough terrain.
Key considerations when buying hiking shoes
-
Fit:"The difference between a good and a bad hiking shoe lies in the fit," says Maurice Verhagen , a certified healthy walking specialist with 65 years of practice at Penninx Schoenen in the Netherlands. People with wide feet need more room in the forefoot and instep, while narrow feet need a snug heel counter. Measure your feet at the end of the day when swelling is highest, and try shoes with the socks you'll actually hike in.
-
Traction:The outsole is what keeps you upright. Aggressive lug patterns grip mud and loose terrain, while trail-specific outsole designs provide added support on rocky and rooted surfaces. Vibram outsoles showed up on many of our top-performing shoes.
-
Waterproofing:Gore-Tex and similar membranes keep water out, and are useful for wet climates and stream crossings. The trade-off is reduced breathability and longer drying times if water does get in. For warm-weather hiking, a breathable, fast-draining shoe may be the smarter pick.
-
Cushioning:Research shows optimal cushioning stiffness depends on body weight , with heavier hikers and pack carriers benefiting from firmer materials. Too much cushioning can make it harder to feel the ground, while too little cushioning can increase joint impact. Shoes that feel well-cushioned are associated with lower injury risk .
-
Weight:Lighter shoes reduce fatigue over long distances. Our tested weights ranged from 8 oz. (Salomon Genesis women's) to 20 oz. (Hoka Kaha 3 GTX men's). If you're doing big miles, every ounce adds up.
-
Sole stiffness:Verhagen highlights that many people overlook sole rigidity. "For hiking, where stability and stiffness are important, the sole must be torsionally rigid and not bend too easily at the forefoot," he says. "Once you have your shoes on, they should be difficult to bend by hand in various directions."
How we tested
We took this testing seriously. We started by researching dozens of hiking shoes and consulting four experts: a board-certified podiatric surgeon, a certified walking specialist, an outdoor retail merchandising director and a hiking travel product director. From there, we selected 25 pairs for hands-on testing across a range of conditions.
I personally tested several pairs alongside eight additional testers — all with different foot types and hiking styles. We put these shoes through a wide variety of terrain and conditions: smooth paths, rocky scrambles, muddy slopes, marshland and pavement, in dry, wet, hot and cold conditions.
Every shoe was scored on:
-
Fit (30%)
-
Initial comfort (10%)
-
Trail performance (20%)
-
Long-term comfort (20%)
-
Protection (10%)
-
Weight and versatility (5%)
-
Overall value (5%)
Final scores were weighed against what our testers actually experienced on the trail to determine the best options.
Other hiking shoes we tested
-
On Cloudrock Mid Waterproof was a standout for style. The classic On Cloud sole felt cushioned and secure, but limited testing time and some toe pinching for wider feet left questions. Promising — just needs more miles to confirm.
-
GORUCK MACV-2 Mid Top looks fantastic and handles terrain well, but our tester developed a painful heel blister on the first outing. Hiking socks and a longer break-in should help — and the high-top version may be the smarter buy for the extra ankle coverage.
-
Columbia Tellurix Titanium OutDry is solid and waterproof, with a bright red colorway that earned compliments on the trail. However, the low top let dirt and rocks sneak in around the ankle, and it felt heavier than expected.
-
Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX had good grip and sturdiness, but comfort fell short. Stiff out of the box with near-blisters on the first wear, they're best suited to short city hikes and easier trails.
-
Adidas Terrex Free Hiker GTX 2.0 impressed with its waterproofing — water didn't seep through even after walking through puddles. Runs large, comes in limited colors and the chunky design wasn't for everyone.
-
La Sportiva Ultra Raptor 3 offered outstanding grip and protection with a lightweight feel. A hard ridge on the tongue rubbed uncomfortably after a few hours, limiting its long-distance appeal.
-
The North Face Verto Approach GTX is a beautifully built approach shoe with excellent grip. Too narrow for our wide-footed tester, and less comfortable than the similarly priced Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX .
-
Kuru Ridge Motion (women's) ran too large, with significant heel lift that caused rubbing and blisters. The leather upper is stylish and protective, and traction was excellent — worth considering as a travel shoe if the fit works for you.
-
Kuru Ridge Motion (men's) scored better. Our tester appreciated the wide toe box and lateral stability, calling them excellent for people with pronation issues. The heel ran a bit roomy and they tend to run warm.
FAQs
How do I choose between a hiking boot and a hiking shoe?
Consider your terrain, distance and pack weight. "The best hiking boot is the one that matches where and how you're hiking," says Todesca. "Conditions, terrain and trip length all play a role." Boots add ankle support for rough terrain and loaded hiking, but increase weight and can shift stress to your knees. Shoes are lighter and more agile for day hikes on moderate trails. "There is no single right answer for every hike," says Beasley-Davis. "The best footwear is the one that allows you to move comfortably, protect your joints and finish the day feeling strong and confident."
How often should you replace hiking shoes?
Most hiking shoes last between 500 and 1,000 miles, depending on terrain, construction and how aggressively you use them. Maximalist foam shoes like the Hoka Speedgoat may wear down well before 500 miles, while leather boots like the GORUCK MACV-2 can last longer with proper care. Watch for compressed cushioning, worn-down tread and reduced support as signs that it's time for a replacement.
Do I need waterproof hiking shoes?
It depends on where you hike. Waterproof membranes are valuable in rainy climates and on trails with stream crossings. The trade-off is reduced breathability and longer dry times if water enters from the top. For warm, dry conditions, a non-waterproof shoe that drains quickly and breathes well is often the better choice.
Should hiking shoes feel comfortable right away?
Ideally, hiking shoes should feel comfortable right away, but a short adjustment period is normal for stiffer or more structured boots. Significant pain or blistering out of the box could be a red flag, but not always (some people tend to blister more easily than others). Research shows that perceived comfort is linked to lower injury risk , so don't push through shoes that feel wrong. Verhagen emphasizes that fit is the single most important factor, and a shoe that doesn't feel right from the start is unlikely to improve dramatically.
Meet our experts
-
Laurel Todesca ,product director at Macs Adventure, a self-guided walking and hiking travel company
-
Dr. Mikel D. Daniels ,DPM, board-certified podiatric surgeon and chief medical officer at WeTreatFeet Podiatry
-
Maurice Verhagen ,certified healthy walking specialist at Penninx Schoenen in the Netherlands
-
Brittany Beasley-Davis ,director of merchandising at Christy Sports , oversees footwear across 50+ locations in the Rocky Mountain region
Our health content is for informational purposes only and is not intended as professional medical advice. Consult a medical professional on questions about your health.
