Stay organized with collectionsSave and categorize content based on your preferences.
Thursday, September 15, 2011
If your site isn't appearing in Google search results, or it's performing more poorly than it once
did (and you believe that it does not violate ourWebmaster Guidelines), you can ask Google to reconsider your site. Over time, we've worked to improve the
reconsideration process for webmasters. A couple of years ago, in addition toconfirming that we had received the request,
we started sending a second message to webmasters confirming that we had processed their request.
This was a huge step for webmasters who were anxiously awaiting results. Since then, we've
received feedback that webmasters wanted to know the outcome of their requests. Earlier this year,
we started experimenting with sending more detailed reconsideration request responses and the
feedback we've gotten has been very positive!
Now, if your site is affected by a manual spam action, we may let you know if we were able to
revoke that manual action based on your reconsideration request. Or, we could tell you if your
site is still in violation of our guidelines. This might be a discouraging thing to hear, but once
you know that there is still a problem, it will help you diagnose the issue.
If your site is not actually affected by any manual action (this is the most common scenario), we
may let you know that as well. Perhaps your site isn't being ranked highly by our algorithms, in
which case our systems will respond to improvements on the site as changes are made, without your
needing to submit a reconsideration request. Or maybe your site has access issues that are
preventing Googlebot from crawling and indexing it. For more help debugging ranking issues, readour article about why a site may not be showing up in Google search results.
We've made a lot of progress on making the entire reconsideration request process more
transparent. We aren't able to reply to individual requests with specific feedback, but now many
webmasters will be able to find out if their site has been affected by a manual action and they'll
know the outcome of the reconsideration review. In an ideal world, Google could be completely
transparent about how every part of our rankings work. However, we have to maintain a delicate
balance: trying to give as much information to webmasters as we can without letting spammers probe
how to do more harm to users. We're happy that Google has set the standard on tools, transparency,
and communication with site owners, but we'll keep looking for ways to do even better.
[[["Easy to understand","easyToUnderstand","thumb-up"],["Solved my problem","solvedMyProblem","thumb-up"],["Other","otherUp","thumb-up"]],[["Missing the information I need","missingTheInformationINeed","thumb-down"],["Too complicated / too many steps","tooComplicatedTooManySteps","thumb-down"],["Out of date","outOfDate","thumb-down"],["Samples / code issue","samplesCodeIssue","thumb-down"],["Other","otherDown","thumb-down"]],[],[[["\u003cp\u003eGoogle has improved the reconsideration process for websites not appearing or performing poorly in search results, offering more detailed responses about manual spam actions and overall site status.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eIf a website is affected by a manual spam action, Google's response will indicate whether the action was revoked or if the site still violates guidelines.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eIn cases where no manual action is taken, Google's response may inform webmasters that their site's ranking is determined by algorithms, with improvements reflected as changes are made.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eWhile Google aims for transparency, they balance providing information to webmasters with preventing spammers from exploiting the system.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eGoogle has enhanced communication with site owners through tools and transparency, but continues to seek improvements in the reconsideration request process.\u003c/p\u003e\n"]]],["Google improved its site reconsideration process. Webmasters now receive notifications regarding manual spam actions, including whether the action was revoked or if violations persist. If no manual action exists, Google may explain if the issue is algorithmic ranking or crawling/indexing related. While specific feedback per request isn't feasible, Google aims for transparency without aiding spammers. The process helps webmasters identify and address site issues impacting search performance. They also offer an article about why a site may not be showing up in search.\n"],null,["# Reconsideration requests get more transparent\n\nThursday, September 15, 2011\n\n\nIf your site isn't appearing in Google search results, or it's performing more poorly than it once\ndid (and you believe that it does not violate our\n[Webmaster Guidelines](/search/docs/essentials)\n), you can ask Google to reconsider your site. Over time, we've worked to improve the\nreconsideration process for webmasters. A couple of years ago, in addition to\n[confirming that we had received the request](/search/blog/2009/06/reconsideration-requests-now-with),\nwe started sending a second message to webmasters confirming that we had processed their request.\nThis was a huge step for webmasters who were anxiously awaiting results. Since then, we've\nreceived feedback that webmasters wanted to know the outcome of their requests. Earlier this year,\nwe started experimenting with sending more detailed reconsideration request responses and the\nfeedback we've gotten has been very positive!\n\n\nNow, if your site is affected by a manual spam action, we may let you know if we were able to\nrevoke that manual action based on your reconsideration request. Or, we could tell you if your\nsite is still in violation of our guidelines. This might be a discouraging thing to hear, but once\nyou know that there is still a problem, it will help you diagnose the issue.\n\n\nIf your site is not actually affected by any manual action (this is the most common scenario), we\nmay let you know that as well. Perhaps your site isn't being ranked highly by our algorithms, in\nwhich case our systems will respond to improvements on the site as changes are made, without your\nneeding to submit a reconsideration request. Or maybe your site has access issues that are\npreventing Googlebot from crawling and indexing it. For more help debugging ranking issues, read\n[our article about why a site may not be showing up in Google search results](https://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=34444).\n\n\nWe've made a lot of progress on making the entire reconsideration request process more\ntransparent. We aren't able to reply to individual requests with specific feedback, but now many\nwebmasters will be able to find out if their site has been affected by a manual action and they'll\nknow the outcome of the reconsideration review. In an ideal world, Google could be completely\ntransparent about how every part of our rankings work. However, we have to maintain a delicate\nbalance: trying to give as much information to webmasters as we can without letting spammers probe\nhow to do more harm to users. We're happy that Google has set the standard on tools, transparency,\nand communication with site owners, but we'll keep looking for ways to do even better.\n\n\nPosted by [Tiffany Oberoi](/search/blog/2011/09/www.linkedin.com/in/tiffany-oberoi) and\n[Michael Wyszomierski](https://wysz.com/about/),\nSearch Quality Team"]]