This article first appeared on GuruFocus .
-
Underlying EBITDA:Record $300.3 million, up 37% year-over-year, in line with guidance.
-
Continuing Operations Underlying EBITDA:$143.3 million, up 37% from the prior year, exceeding the guidance range of $130-$135 million.
-
Revenue:Increased 27% to just under $1.3 billion.
-
Underlying EPS:$0.342, up 51% year-over-year.
-
Statutory NPAT:$136.1 million, up 89% from the prior corresponding period.
-
Cash Flow Conversion:93% of EBITDA, within the targeted range.
-
Civil Construction and Hire Segment EBITDA:Increased 64% to $65.1 million on revenue of $424.9 million, up 47%.
-
Residential Real Estate EBITDA (excl. fair value gains):Increased 64% to $28.8 million, with 264 lots settled versus 201 in FY25.
-
Commercial Real Estate EBITDA:Increased 20% to $59.4 million, driven by fair value gains of $57.4 million.
-
Construction Materials Segment Revenue:Increased 24% to $629.6 million, with EBITDA largely in line with FY25 at $115.4 million.
-
Net Debt:Total underlying net debt at June 30 was $826 million, with a leverage ratio of 2.6 times.
-
Capital Recycling:Realized proceeds of almost $100 million during FY26, with a further $158.3 million contracted to sell over the next 18 months.
-
Warning! GuruFocus has detected 8 Warning Sign with ASX:MGH.
-
Is ASX:MGH fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator.
Release Date: August 19, 2026
For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript .
Positive Points
-
Record underlying EBITDA of $300.3 million, up 37% year-over-year, in line with guidance.
-
Continuing operations underlying EBITDA of $143.3 million, up 37% and above guidance, demonstrating core business strength.
-
Strong cash flow conversion of 93%, within the targeted range, reflecting disciplined working capital management.
-
Secured $1.2 billion in electrical work in hand, providing locked-in earnings growth for FY27 and beyond.
-
Construction Materials sale to Heidelberg for $1.7 billion approved by ACCC, on track to settle in October 2026, crystallizing significant value.
-
New capital management framework prioritizing share buybacks, with $55.1 million already allocated, enhancing total shareholder return.
-
Capital recycling program realized $99.3 million in proceeds, with a further $158.3 million contracted, demonstrating effective asset monetization.
-
Continuing operations return on capital employed improved to 19%, up from 10% in the prior year, reflecting strong earnings recovery.
-
Strong residential real estate outlook with 200 lots already secured for FY27 and stable pricing in key markets.
-
Diversified business model across electrical, real estate, and investments, positioning for long-term growth.
Negative Points
-
Safety performance deteriorated with LTIFR increasing to 5.6% from 4.7% in FY25, remaining above benchmark targets.
-
Construction Materials segment EBITDA was largely flat despite revenue growth, impacted by fuel cost inflation and softer demand.
-
Commercial real estate cash flow conversion was negative 50% due to timing of development spend and unrealized fair value gains.
-
No final dividend declared for FY26, which may disappoint income-focused investors despite the buyback program.
-
Leverage ratio of 2.6 times is at the higher end of the target range, though expected to decrease post-Construction Materials sale.
-
Net maintenance CapEx increased to $22 million from $9 million in the prior year, driven by acquisitions and historical low base.
-
Total recordable injuries increased to 94 from 89 in FY25, indicating ongoing safety challenges.
-
Land gross profit per lot decreased to $105,000 from $112,000 in FY25, reflecting product mix changes.
-
The Aerotropolis project currently contributes minimal earnings, with only interest income offsetting expenses until milestones are achieved.
-
The sale of Construction Materials will result in a significant reduction in capital employed, requiring successful redeployment to maintain growth.
Q & A Highlights
Q: Can you provide an update on the delivery capacity for the $855 million electrical manufacturing contract, including where the power cubes are being assembled and the production rate? Also, what additional opportunities are you seeing beyond this contract? A: Wesley Maas (CEO & Managing Director): The $855 million contract will be delivered within an 18-month period. We have large-scale manufacturing facilities in Australia, including locations at Newcastle, Orange, and Gabba, with some components being built in Vietnam. The electrical business is quite diverse, covering distribution, transmission, manufacturing, and power services. We are seeing strong demand in the transmission space and significant tailwinds in digital infrastructure, with many projects requiring work in the transmission space and manufacturing.
Q: Regarding the Firmus electrical infrastructure project, has the over 40% completion translated to equivalent revenue recognition, and what margin achievement has been booked in these numbers? A: Craig Bellamy (CFO): Yes, the revenue has been recognized on a straight-line basis in accordance with accounting standards, around the $80 million mark. In terms of margin, we have previously guided in the 15% to 20% range, which is reflective of what is in the accounts at June.
Q: Can you give an update on how much capacity you have through the existing network of factories to deliver the second, much larger contract? Does that contract absorb a lot of that capacity, or is there still space available, particularly in Vietnam, to take on further growth? A: Wesley Maas (CEO & Managing Director): At the end of the period, we were 40-odd percent finished on the first order and we are continuing to scale up. We do have further capacity beyond that second order. While I don't have an exact percentage, we are definitely working towards scaling up beyond that, and there is additional capacity available to continue to scale and grow.
Q: Have you had conversations or are you getting inbound interest from other parties outside of Firmus on the back of these initial contracts? How do you see the future growth potential of that business outside of Firmus? A: Wesley Maas (CEO & Managing Director): The business is very broad, and we are already working for many of the other data center providers today, even prior to working for Firmus. It is widely reported that various data centers are coming online in various locations, and we are doing quite a bit of work in the transmission space to connect these data centers. We definitely see the future pipeline as quite exciting, working for many of the operators.
Q: On the acquisition front, and thinking through the lens of your updated capital allocation framework, can you give more color on your focus for strategic acquisitions? How have you refined your thinking over the last 6 to 12 months? A: Craig Bellamy (CFO): Our approach is unchanged. We are looking to bolster our existing businesses, particularly in Electrical, where we have a strong outlook. We are looking at potential acquisitions to bolster our capability and spread a little further in that supply chain, though we have nothing definitive right now. We have a clear focus on return on capital and a few rules: we must understand what we are doing, we must be able to add value, and it must be scalable.
Q: Will you start booking fair value gains on the Aerotropolis in FY27 as you revalue those lots? A: Wesley Maas (CEO & Managing Director): Possibly, it just depends on the vision during FY27. It will be effectively milestone-driven, which will drive those valuations. Under accounting standards, most likely there will be some contribution. At present, you can see in the accounts there is a fair value component which has been adjusted to the net interest expense in the underlying result, so it is just the interest play at this particular stage.
Q: Regarding the Aerotropolis, what is the balance sheet impact? Are you recognizing that drawdown with Metrics on balance sheet as debt? A: Craig Bellamy (CFO): Yes, we are. There is effectively a financial asset for the amount advanced out by us and a financial liability for the drawdown from Metrics. Because it is a back-to-back scenario, there is a very negligible effect on the net debt basis from the Aerotropolis, which is what you would expect given the announcement prior to June 30.
Q: Have you missed out on any acquisition opportunities recently given your financial discipline, especially with a lot of interest in the electrical space? A: Craig Bellamy (CFO): No, we haven't. We have not been in a process where we have missed out. The answer is no.
Q: I saw press coverage of an industrial site that Maas Group reportedly acquired in Newcastle. Is that for commercial property development purposes or part of your efforts to expand capacity within the electrical segment? A: Wesley Maas (CEO & Managing Director): It is for commercial development.
For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript .
