Yahoo

Macro Roundup: China's Trade Data Puzzle

  • China's January trade data were an upside surprise, and the reasons for the jump in exports and imports are not entirely clear.

  • Exports may have been boosted by expectations of tighter monetary policy.

  • Commodity stockpiling and a switch to cleaner raw materials may have boosted imports.

China's January foreign trade data were an upside surprise. Given that it does not match a range of other data, it has been heavily scrutinized. While some questions have been resolved, some puzzles remain and will be resolved only with more data.

Reasons for pessimism

Prior to the release of the trade data there were some reasons we expected a fairly downbeat set of numbers. Both the official and HSBC January PMI surveys showed that manufacturers were pessimistic about the export outlook. Speculative inflows in early 2013 inflated the export numbers, and so were expected to lower the year on year growth rates in early 2014. Also, January this year had one less working day than January 2013, due to the earlier lunar new year. Hence the upside surprise in the trade data was indeed a surprise. Both export and import growth accelerated, and the trade surplus rose to US$31.9 billion.

There was a time that the foreign trade data was considered one of China's more reliable indicators, because exports and imports data can be matched with trading partners, which makes manipulation easy to spot. There were some 'hot money' inflows during the pre-2008 boom period but this was relatively minimal. However, trade flows became wildly distorted last year, as seen in the surge in reported exports to Hong Kong, which forced the customs department to pledge to investigate the matter.

A range of export subsidies announced in late 2012 amplified this effect as businesses booked fake exports to claim tax credits. The "round-tripping" phenomenon, whereby firms export from the mainland to a Hong Kong partner to claim the tax credit, which then sends it back, is less apparent this time around. Instead, export gains were broad based. Exports to the U.S., EU and Japan grew at double-digit year on year rates. Exports also grew broadly on a product basis, not just in exports of electronics (which was the product category that was used for round-tripping a year ago).

At this point it is hard to see if there is a genuine reacceleration in exports, more sophisticated tax dodging or some statistical quirk that may wash out after the Lunar New Year. It is likely that some of the export revenues reflect speculative capital, which is reentering China because of improved fundamentals and expectations of higher interest rates.

In its latest monetary policy report, the People's Bank of China signaled continued monetary tightening, and for the past few months markets have steadily priced in higher interest rates. The spread between one-year and 10-year government bonds has risen from negative in June 2013 to 0.95 basis points currently, the highest spread since mid 2012.

January's performance notwithstanding, monetary tightening will slow exports by pushing the currency higher. The government has set a real export growth target of 7.5% for 2014, which would be a deceleration from the 7.9% increase seen in 2013.

The imports puzzle

The other puzzle is on the imports side. January imports grew as much as exports did. Most of the increase was in commodities (as opposed to electronic component imports, which were flat). Commodity imports generally spike before the Lunar New Year as producers stockpile raw materials, but the increase in January was much higher than expected. Crude oil imports rose 12.5% y/y, coal imports rose 6%, while copper imports rose 22.5%. Iron ore imports jumped 44.4% to US$11.35 billion.

This may be related to the government's pledge to cut pollution, which is reducing the supply of dirtier locally produced coal and iron ore. It is possible that firms are hoping for increased demand (extended tax subsidies for fuel efficient cars may be encouraging steelmakers to increase production), but the continued monetary tightening will probably dampen investment on a macro scale.

Alaistair Chan is an Economist at Moody's Analytics.


More from Dismal Scientist:

Mobilize your Website
View Site in Mobile | Classic
Share by: