Oil and gas producer Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) reported revenue ahead of Wall Street's expectations in Q3 2026, with revenue up 38.4% year on year to $5.43 billion. Its non-GAAP profit of $5.86 per share was 4.6% above analysts' consensus estimates.
For more on Diamondback Energy, read our full research report .
Diamondback Energy (FANG) Q3 2026 highlights:
-
Revenue$5.43 billion vs S&P analysts' consensus estimates of $4.87 billion (38.4% year-on-year growth, 11.6% beat)
-
Adjusted EPS$5.86 vs S&P analysts' consensus estimates of $5.60 (4.6% beat)
-
Adjusted EBITDA$3.39 billion vs analysts' consensus estimates of $3.49 billion (62.5% margin, 2.9% miss)
-
Operating margin46%, up from 31.5% in the same quarter last year
-
Free cash flow margin29%, down from 41% in the same quarter last year
-
Oil productionrose 4.2% year on year
-
Market capitalization$59.39 billion
Revenue growth
A company's long-term performance can give signals about its business quality. Even a bad business, especially in a cyclical industry, can perform well for a year or so, but a top-tier one should exhibit resilience through cycles. Diamondback Energy's revenue grew at a strong 31.1% compounded annual growth rate over the last five years. Its growth surpassed the average energy upstream and integrated energy company and shows its offerings resonate with customers.
Energy cycles can be long enough that a single five-year period can still reflect one price environment, which is why an additional, decade-long view can help capture through-cycle performance. Diamondback Energy's annualized revenue growth of 44.9% over the last ten years is above its five-year trend.
While looking at revenue is important, it can also introduce noise around commodity prices and M&A. Analyzing drivers of revenue, on the other hand, highlights what is happening inside the asset base and whether the economic footprint of a company is expanding. Over the last two years, Diamondback Energy's oil production averaged 38.8% year-on-year growth while its natural gas production averaged 58% year-on-year growth.
This quarter, Diamondback Energy reported strong year-on-year revenue growth of 38.4%, and its $5.43 billion of revenue exceeded Wall Street's consensus estimates by 11.6%. Its oil production grew a modest 4.2% year on year.
Adjusted EBITDA margin
Adjusted EBITDA margin captures the underlying operating profitability of an energy producer by removing accounting effects related to depletion and capitalized drilling costs. It reveals how much cash the asset base generates before capital structure and reinvestment requirements shape reported earnings.
Diamondback Energy has performed well over the last five years. It demonstrated high profitability for an upstream and integrated energy business, with an average EBITDA margin of 71.5%.
Diamondback Energy's EBITDA margin decreased by 10.5 percentage points over the last year. This raises questions about the company's expense base because its revenue growth should have given it leverage on its fixed costs, resulting in better economies of scale and profitability.
In Q3, Diamondback Energy generated an EBITDA margin of 62.5%, down 4.8 percentage points year on year. This contraction shows it was less efficient because its expenses grew faster than its revenue. This adjusted EBITDA fell short of Wall Street's consensus estimates.
Free cash flow
As mentioned above, adjusted EBITDA ignores capital structure and drilling expenditure decisions. These are two major aspects of an energy producer's business, so investors need to account for them to get a comprehensive picture of business quality. In other words, adjusted EBITDA margins could be solid but free cash flow could be poor because asset decline rates are high and drilling is expensive. Free cash flow tells you not only about the economics of past production but also how much it costs to stay in business through further drilling or extraction.
Diamondback Energy has shown strong cash profitability, driven by its lucrative business model that enables it to reinvest, return capital to investors and stay ahead of the competition. The company's free cash flow margin was among the best in the energy upstream and integrated energy sector, averaging 36.7% over the last five years.
Absolute free cash flow margin levels matter, but so does stability. All else equal, a steady 25.0% average free cash flow margin across commodity price cycles is preferable to very high margins when times are good and negative ones when they're tough.
Diamondback Energy's ratio of quarterly free cash flow volatility to West Texas Intermediate, or WTI, crude oil price volatility over the past five years was 2.9 (lower is better), indicating unusually strong insulation from commodity swings. This stability supports superior capital access in downturns and positions Diamondback Energy to act as a consolidator when weaker peers are forced to retrench.
Why assess stability against commodity prices using free cash flow rather than revenue or EBITDA in Diamondback Energy's case? What ultimately matters is not how much revenue or profit a company earns when prices are high but how much cash it can generate when prices are low. Free cash flow is the superior metric because it captures hedging effectiveness, growth and maintenance capex and management behavior during good times and bad.
Diamondback Energy's free cash flow was $1.57 billion in Q3, equivalent to a 29% margin. The company's cash profitability declined, with its margin 12 percentage points lower than in the same quarter last year, an unfavorable result considering its longer-term trend.
Key takeaways from Diamondback Energy's Q3 results
A sizable revenue beat and EPS above Wall Street's consensus estimates gave Diamondback Energy's quarter some key positives, but EBITDA missed estimates. Shares rose 2.1% to $203.56 immediately after the results.
Is Diamondback Energy an attractive investment? To make that decision, consider the bigger picture of valuation and business quality, as well as the latest earnings. For more, read the free full research report here .
