Lockheed Martin has surged on the back of contract wins and a strong defense spending backdrop. The question now is whether a share price near US$636.95 is adequately supported by the cash the business is expected to generate. With much of the recent enthusiasm rooted in large, long-term programs, investors are increasingly asking how the current valuation lines up against those future cash flows.
-
Over the past 5 years the stock has returned 114.2%, which puts real weight on whether the current valuation still lines up with what the company's cash flows can justify.
-
New multi year agreements such as the framework to produce and sustain hundreds of F 35 jets and contracts for systems like the ARRW hypersonic missile can support visibility on future revenue and may influence both the timing and durability of Lockheed Martin's cash generation.
-
If you'd rather focus on earnings, this one's for you. See what Lockheed Martin's 22.6x P/E says about the price .
The issue now is whether Lockheed Martin's recent share price level is justified by its cash flows when assessed against an intrinsic value estimate built from those cash flows.
If you want more than a single defense contractor in your watchlist, a focused screen of 39 power grid technology and infrastructure stocks .
Does Lockheed Martin Look Undervalued on Cash Flow?
The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model here uses Lockheed Martin's future free cash flows and discounts them back to today in $. On this view, the projections put the estimated intrinsic value meaningfully above the current share price of US$636.95. Latest twelve month free cash flow sits around US$8.2b, and the model assumes that this cash generation continues to grow rather than shrink over time.
The pattern in the forecast is for free cash flow to rise gradually into the early 2030s, which is presented as consistent with a mature contractor leaning on large multi year programs rather than banking on sharp step changes. The 10 year framework for 850 F 35 jets is cited as support for those projected cash flows, because it adds visibility on aircraft and support work feeding into that future free cash flow stream. On the model's numbers, the stock price is presented as not yet reflecting the full value of those projected cash flows, which is why the DCF points to an intrinsic value meaningfully above where the shares trade today. Find out what Lockheed Martin could be worth using our Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) estimate .
The Lockheed Martin Narrative: What Would Justify Today's Price?
Simply Wall St Narratives pick up where the Lockheed Martin valuation question leaves off. They spell out which paths for revenue, margins and earnings would need to play out for the stock to be worth meaningfully more or less than today's price on the Community page. Each narrative treats Lockheed Martin's fair value as an idea you can test over time, so you can see how the underlying business case holds up as new information arrives.
Lockheed Martin brings out two distinct interpretations, with one group seeing more upside in the backlog and programs than the more cautious camp.
Bull case: roughly fairly valued
"A record backlog of about US$230b supported by a book to bill ratio of 3.2 to 1 and large multiyear awards such as the seven year US$35b THAAD contract and major radar and space orders points to a multi year period where new work converts into sales, earnings and free cash flow…"
Discover why this Narrative puts Lockheed Martin at roughly fairly valued .
Bear case: 30% overvalued
"While multiyear munitions frameworks and related capex are framed as volume and efficiency opportunities, they also commit Lockheed Martin to very high output levels on PAC-3, THAAD and other lines…"
Explore why this Narrative puts Lockheed Martin at 30% overvalued .
One unresolved question for Lockheed Martin
Valuation models only tell part of the story, and our research on Lockheed Martin has also identified specific areas of concern that deserve your attention before you draw any conclusions. Take a closer look at 1 warning sign before settling on a valuation.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Companies discussed in this article include LMT .
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
