Never miss an important update on your stock portfolio and cut through the noise. Over 7 million investors trust Simply Wall St to stay informed where it matters for FREE.

SharonAI Holdings (SHAZ) has drawn fresh attention after announcing a five year, US$1.32b cloud computing service agreement with a global AI lab, focused on data center deployments in New Zealand.

See our latest analysis for SharonAI Holdings.

Despite the contract headlines, SharonAI Holdings has seen its share price fall 7.1% over the last day and 22.9% over the past month. However, the 90 day share price return of 77.2% and very large 1 year total shareholder return suggest earlier momentum is now cooling from elevated levels.

If this kind of AI infrastructure story has your attention, it could be worth scanning a wider field of opportunities using our screener of 53 AI infrastructure stocks

After a sharp pullback following contract excitement, SharonAI Holdings now sits between long dated AI factory commitments and a still loss making core business. Does that balance of risk and potential reward still lean in favour of new buyers?

Preferred Price to Book of 17.3x: Is It Justified?

With SharonAI Holdings last closing at $65.60 and still a young, loss making AI infrastructure business, the current price tag effectively hinges on what investors are willing to pay for its balance sheet and future potential. The key reference point here is the price to book ratio of 17.3x.

The price to book ratio compares the company's market value to the accounting value of its net assets, which can be a useful yardstick for asset heavy or early stage companies that are not yet profitable. For SharonAI Holdings, where revenue is small at $1.54m and net income is a loss of $58.11m, earnings based multiples are less informative, so P/B becomes a more prominent reference.

On that measure, SharonAI Holdings trades at 17.3x book value. That is described as good value compared with a peer average of 105.3x, suggesting investors are paying a lower price relative to assets than for some directly comparable companies. However, compared with the broader US IT industry average of 2.8x, the stock is described as expensive, which highlights how much of the current valuation rests on expectations around future AI infrastructure growth rather than current revenue or profits.

Given that there is insufficient data to calculate a fair P/B ratio using the SWS fair ratio model, investors are left comparing SharonAI Holdings directly with peers and the wider IT sector instead of a regression based target. That mix of cheaper than narrow peers but far richer than the sector average frames the question of whether SharonAI Holdings current position between rapid forecast revenue growth and ongoing losses is enough to support such a premium.