This article first appeared on GuruFocus .
Release Date: August 25, 2026
For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript .
Positive Points
-
Normalized EBIT improved 23.7% year-on-year, with second-half earnings up 40% compared to the first half, demonstrating improved operating leverage.
-
Volumes increased 15.9% and revenue grew 13.9%, with normalized EBITDA surging 376% from $2.1 million to $9.9 million.
-
The Perimetal Protection (PERI) acquisition continues to outperform, with revenue and earnings trending above the business case and cross-sell synergies materializing as planned.
-
The company has successfully reduced SKUs from 23,000 to around 13,000 and implemented a net stock forecasting platform, improving inventory efficiency and working capital management.
-
A comprehensive portfolio review has led to decisive actions to exit loss-making businesses (reinforcing/wire and plate processing) and consolidate sites, which is expected to release capital and improve future profitability.
-
Banking arrangements with ANZ were renewed until September 2027, providing financial stability and revised covenants that offer flexibility.
Negative Points
-
The company reported a statutory loss of $61.2 million after tax, including a significant $51.9 million impairment charge, reflecting continued balance sheet pressure.
-
New Zealand has experienced three consecutive recessionary years, with the downturn lasting longer than anticipated, delaying the return to profitability.
-
The emerging market recovery was disrupted by renewed geopolitical uncertainty (Middle East conflict), cost inflation, and pre-election caution, slowing growth momentum in the fourth quarter.
-
The base business margin declined due to intense competitive pressure, product mix, and cost inflation, offsetting some of the gains from volume growth and acquisitions.
-
The reinforcing and wire business lost approximately $7.5 million in normalized EBIT, and the plate processing business has consistently underperformed investment criteria, leading to their exit.
-
Net debt remains elevated at $48 million, with dividends on hold and M&A activity paused to prioritize balance sheet repair.
Q & A Highlights
-
Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with NZSE:STU.
-
Is NZSE:STU fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator.
Q: Can you provide more detail on the performance of the Perimetal Protection (Peri's) acquisition, given that its reported EBIT appears lower than the historical figures mentioned at the time of acquisition? A: Mark Malpass (CEO) and Richard Smykes (CFO) explained that the difference is primarily due to the allocation of the group's corporate levy, which did not exist in Peri's standalone historical numbers. On a like-for-like basis, revenue is approximately $33.5 million, slightly up on the prior period, and earnings have improved by just over $1 million year-on-year. The business has been incredibly resilient, with about 25% of Peri's customer base being new to Steel & Tube, and cross-selling synergies are continuing to grow in both directions.
Q: Regarding the portfolio reset, what is the expected timing for the asset sales and site closures, and what EBIT benefit will flow through from exiting these loss-making businesses? A: Mark Malpass (CEO) stated that consultation on the reinforcing and wire business has commenced, with a wind-down expected over two to three months. An agreement with Euro Corporation for the assets is subject to Commerce Commission approval, with most value expected to be realized by Christmas. Richard Smykes (CFO) added that inventory reductions will occur quickly, with cash proceeds following after the sales are completed. The seven smaller site closures will deliver a net cash benefit of $2 million by the end of FY27, with benefits starting in FY28. No specific EBIT guidance was provided for the exits.
Q: Given the $18 million unwind in working capital, should we expect inventory to reduce further, or will it increase as you build inventory for a cyclical recovery? A: Mark Malpass (CEO) indicated that inventory levels are expected to remain relatively flat. While the exit of the reinforcing, wire, and plate processing businesses will reduce inventory, volume growth from market recovery will offset this. He highlighted the success of SKU rationalization (from 23,000 to 13,000 SKUs) and improved inventory management, which allowed for a 15.9% volume increase while reducing inventory levels year-on-year. Richard Smykes (CFO) added that site consolidations will also reduce the need for safety stock.
Q: Can you provide any guidance on expected volumes, earnings skew between halves, or pricing and margin expectations for the year ahead? A: Mark Malpass (CEO) declined to provide formal forward guidance but noted the positive trajectory seen in the first three quarters, with the business reaching breakeven and positive normalized earnings before the Middle East conflict disrupted momentum. He expects the recovery to be gradual and uneven, with the first half of FY27 likely remaining variable. He suggested that calendar year 2027 is when macro volume improvements should start to materialize, with earnings likely to be more second-half weighted.
Q: The revenue growth of 13.9% is lower than the volume growth of 15.9%. Does this suggest margins are shrinking? A: Mark Malpass (CEO) corrected the premise, noting that revenue was up 13.9% versus volumes up 15.9%, indicating minimal compression. He pointed to the product margin graph showing general improvement, including a $5 million improvement in core product margins when excluding Peri's. The company has deliberately shifted its mix towards manufacturing and rural sectors, which has improved overall margins despite competitive pressures in the core steel commodity business.
Q: Looking at the waterfall chart, it appears the base business is more stable than it really is, given the allocation of overheads to growth investments like Peri's. Can you clarify the base business performance? A: Mark Malpass (CEO) acknowledged the overhead allocation but emphasized that on a like-for-like basis, Peri's EBIT improved by $1.1 million year-on-year. He clarified that the metals businesses (stainless, aluminium, mechanical services) are performing well, while the core steel commodity business remains challenged due to weak vertical construction and intense competition. The company is optimizing the steel core through cost initiatives and site reductions, while exiting the reinforcing, wire, and plate processing businesses, which have been a drag on performance.
Q: Can you quantify the revenue contribution of the wire and plate processing closures, and what is the impact on the bottom line? A: Mark Malpass (CEO) did not disclose specific revenue figures but revealed that the reinforcing and wire business lost approximately $7.5 million in normalized EBIT for FY26, including its share of corporate levy. He described the business as structurally challenged due to low barriers to entry and undisciplined competitors, despite being the highest quality player in the space. The decision to exit was based on the business failing to meet cost of capital returns over time.
Q: Regarding the lease store closures, are you coming to the end of these leases, or do you need to sublease the sites to remove ongoing obligations? A: Mark Malpass (CEO) explained that there is a mix of lease expiries and assignment opportunities. The company has secured sublease or assignment options for the seven smaller sites and is in discussions with multiple interested parties for the two larger sites. He expects to clear these sites without significant impairments, aside from one site where an impairment has been booked. Richard Smykes (CFO) clarified that the $20 million impairment is primarily related to cash-generating unit assessments, allocated to goodwill and then pro-rata across fixed assets, intangibles, and right-of-use assets, with no inventory impairment.
Q: How does Vulcan Steel's performance compare to Steel & Tube in the same tough market? A: Mark Malpass (CEO) noted that based on available disclosures, Steel & Tube appears to have slightly stronger revenue and volume growth in New Zealand. The key difference is Vulcan's large plate processing business, which has contributed to their strong EBITDA growth. Steel & Tube had attempted to acquire a large player in that space but faced vendor's remorse, leading to organic growth attempts that proved capital-intensive and faced strong competitor reactions. The company has decided to exit plate processing but remains open to acquisition opportunities in that space once the balance sheet is rebuilt.
Q: What consideration has been given to a capital raise to reduce interest-bearing debt? A: Mark Malpass (CEO) stated that all capital management options have been considered by the board, but there are no immediate plans to raise incremental capital. The portfolio review actions, including asset sales and site closures, are expected to shore up the balance sheet. The company has a constructive relationship with its banking
For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript .
