This article first appeared on GuruFocus .
-
TCE Earnings:USD512 million in Q2 2026, more than doubling from USD208 million in the same period last year.
-
EBITDA:USD416 million, up from USD127 million in Q2 2025.
-
Net Profit:USD338 million, compared to USD59 million in Q2 2025.
-
Earnings Per Share (EPS):USD3.31 for the quarter.
-
Average TCE Rate:USD59,300 per day fleet-wide, more than double the prior-year quarter.
-
LR2 Vessel Earnings:Approximately USD67,000 per day.
-
LR1 and MR Vessel Earnings:Both generating just above USD57,000 per day.
-
Operating Expenses:USD8,315 per day, with increases driven by higher crew change expenses and consumable costs.
-
Interim Dividend:USD2.4 per share, totaling approximately USD246 million.
-
Net Interest-Bearing Debt:Decreased to USD715 million from USD894 million at the end of Q1.
-
Net Loan-to-Value Ratio:Improved to 2.4%.
-
Fleet Size:97 vessels at quarter end.
-
Full-Year 2026 TCE Guidance:Increased to USD1.4 billion to USD1.6 billion.
-
Full-Year 2026 EBITDA Guidance:Increased to USD1 billion to USD1.2 billion.
Release Date: August 26, 2026
For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript .
Positive Points
-
Record Q2 2026 financial performance with TCE earnings of USD512 million, EBITDA of USD416 million, and net profit of USD338 million, more than doubling year-over-year.
-
Strong market positioning with fleet-wide average TCE rates of USD59,300 per day, significantly above historical averages.
-
Increased full-year 2026 guidance to TCE earnings of USD1.4-1.6 billion and EBITDA of USD1.0-1.2 billion, reflecting high earnings visibility with 30% of days remaining open.
-
Robust balance sheet with net loan-to-value ratio improved to 2.4% and net interest-bearing debt reduced to USD715 million, providing financial flexibility.
-
Commitment to shareholder returns with an interim dividend of USD2.4 per share (total USD246 million), distributing all free cash flow after debt installments.
-
Strategic fleet renewal through newbuilding and resale investments, with deliveries scheduled from 2027 to 2029, ensuring a modern and efficient fleet.
-
Operational excellence demonstrated by the One TORM platform, which generated over USD200 million in additional TCE earnings compared to peers from 2023-2025.
Negative Points
-
Dependence on geopolitical tensions and disruptions, such as the Strait of Hormuz closure, which are unpredictable and could reverse, leading to market volatility.
-
MR segment performance lags behind LR2s due to reduced crude availability and refinery runs, limiting spillover trades and potentially affecting earnings.
-
Rising operating expenses, with daily opex increasing to USD8,315 per day due to higher crew change and consumable costs, pressuring margins.
-
Potential oversupply risk from newbuilding orders, especially in LR2 and Aframax segments, which could lead to future fleet growth and lower rates.
-
Uncertainty around the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and normalization of trade flows, which could lead to a sudden drop in freight rates and earnings.
-
High asset values and secondhand prices may limit attractive divestment opportunities, reducing potential capital gains from fleet sales.
-
Geopolitical risks, including sanctions and security threats, could disrupt operations and increase costs, impacting financial performance.
Q & A Highlights
Q: Jacob, you spent a lot of time talking about the justification for the newbuildings. Looking at it from the other side, it looks like roughly 30% of the fleet almost is 15 years or older. You have these incredible prices for secondhand vessels, including older tonnage at present. Have you considered an acceleration of maybe some divestitures to lock in some of these elevated prices on the resale side? A: Jacob Meldgaard, CEO: We have considered that. What we have found so far is that when we take the NPV of a potential sale of any of our assets versus a conservative estimate of what we will be earning until our usual life, that calculation will detail whether we do this or not. I'm not seeing any signs that we should accelerate based on that calculation.
Q: The MRs had a nice little spike when the conflict broke out in the Middle East, but they've since normalized back to long-term averages. Is there any other difference? Is it just a trade flow amount of products leading the Middle East? And is there a catch-up trade to the MRs that you foresee once there is some return on normalization in global trade flows? A: Jacob Meldgaard, CEO: Every day, we are depleting inventory globally. The crude oil and product being moved is obviously lower volumes than before the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Crude is definitely moving to a higher degree and arriving at the refinery side. But the spillover trades for the MRs to pick up are simply not occurring as often in an environment where there aren't enough cargoes. As long as we're in this environment where there isn't enough crude to meet daily consumption, the spillover trades from the refinery side will be less. You need to see more volumes of crude that meet or exceed daily consumption before refineries and arbitrage phases really start to reopen so that the MRs can come in.
Q: How important are the trading inefficiencies behind the recent rebound in LR2 rates versus cargo flows? A: Jacob Meldgaard, CEO: There are two things on the supply side. We saw 70 fewer LR2s today, proving that the order book story was not the total story. Volumes have kept coming down because of disruptions, especially in the Middle East, with long-haul LR2 cargoes like diesel from Middle East to Europe not moving. Effective supply of clean trading LR2s has been coming down, keeping the market at bay. Now, with the inefficiencies, you only need a little more volume, like ship-to-ship transfers, to create a stronger dent. Middle Eastern states are contemplating expanding this "oil bridge" as a strategic response to the closure, which would be beneficial for LR2s.
Q: You're seeing the Chinese ramping up refining runs. So hopefully, that will add some volumes going into the fall. How comfortable are you and how bullish are you on the next few months of products? A: Jacob Meldgaard, CEO: We are constructive around it. Historically, we've probably never seen more choke points. Our thinking is that most of these choke points will either remain as they are or be positive for product tankers. Regarding the Strait of Hormuz, I don't think the current status quo is how it will stay. Either we will find a solution, or you will see this oil bridge expanded. Both those scenarios are positive in our opinion for product tankers.
Q: You're sort of doubling down on the MRs here. Can you talk a bit through your reasoning on doing MR newbuilds as opposed to LR2s? A: Jacob Meldgaard, CEO: We are not in love with any particular segment. The way we come to investment decisions is by looking at the cost of an asset and our expected cash flow from that investment. In the second and into the third quarter, it has been the better choice to place our money on the MR based on prices, delivery, and specification. That doesn't mean we could not do LR1s or LR2s at any time, but currently, MRs have been the best choice for our shareholders.
Q: You haven't disclosed any prices on the new fixed plus 2 vessels. But can you talk a bit about what we should expect in terms of financial leverage as a percentage? A: Kim Balle, CFO: Pretty standard on that currently. We would normally finance our business at 50% leverage. That's a nice sweet spot. The situation we are in gives us ample flexibility with very low margins and fairly long funding structures. We think this is a very good place to be.
For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript .
